Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 12.37.010 (2026)
Authorization to intercept communications
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 12.37.010. Authorization to intercept communications.
The attorney general, or a person designated in writing or by law to act for the attorney general, may authorize, in writing, an ex parte application to a court of competent jurisdiction for an order authorizing the interception of a private communication if the interception may provide evidence of, or may assist in the apprehension of persons who have committed, are committing, or are planning to commit, the following offenses:
(1) murder in the first or second degree under AS 11.41.100 — 11.41.110;
(2) kidnapping under AS 11.41.300;
(3) a class A or unclassified felony drug offense under AS 11.71;
(4) sex trafficking in the first or second degree under AS 11.66.110 and 11.66.120; or
(5) human trafficking in the first degree under AS 11.41.360.
The attorney general, or a person designated in writing or by law to act for the attorney general, may authorize, in writing, an ex parte application to a court of competent jurisdiction for an order authorizing the interception of a private communication if the interception may provide evidence of, or may assist in the apprehension of persons who have committed, are committing, or are planning to commit, the following offenses:
(1) murder in the first or second degree under AS 11.41.100 — 11.41.110;
(2) kidnapping under AS 11.41.300;
(3) a class A or unclassified felony drug offense under AS 11.71;
(4) sex trafficking in the first or second degree under AS 11.66.110 and 11.66.120; or
(5) human trafficking in the first degree under AS 11.41.360.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1997–2007 · leading case: State v. Mullens, 650 S.E.2d 169 (W. Va. 2007).
State v. Mullens, 650 S.E.2d 169 (W. Va. 2007). “See Alaska Stat. § 12.37.010 , et seq. (2006); Ariz.”
Bachlet v. State, 941 P.2d 200 (Alaska Ct. App. 1997). “[6] AS 12.37.010 provides: Authorization to intercept communications.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.