Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 13.06.030 (2026)
Effect of fraud and evasion; limitations
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 13.06.030. Effect of fraud and evasion; limitations.
Whenever fraud has been perpetrated in connection with any proceeding or in any statement filed under AS 13.06 — AS 13.36 or if fraud is used to avoid or circumvent the provisions or purposes of AS 13.06 — AS 13.36, any person injured thereby may obtain appropriate relief against the perpetrator of the fraud or restitution from any person, other than a bona fide purchaser, benefiting from the fraud, whether innocent or not. Any proceeding must be commenced within two years after the discovery of the fraud, but no proceeding may be brought against one not a perpetrator of the fraud later than five years after the time of commission of the fraud. This section has no bearing on remedies relating to fraud practiced on a decedent during the decedent's lifetime that affects the succession of the decedent's estate.
Whenever fraud has been perpetrated in connection with any proceeding or in any statement filed under AS 13.06 — AS 13.36 or if fraud is used to avoid or circumvent the provisions or purposes of AS 13.06 — AS 13.36, any person injured thereby may obtain appropriate relief against the perpetrator of the fraud or restitution from any person, other than a bona fide purchaser, benefiting from the fraud, whether innocent or not. Any proceeding must be commenced within two years after the discovery of the fraud, but no proceeding may be brought against one not a perpetrator of the fraud later than five years after the time of commission of the fraud. This section has no bearing on remedies relating to fraud practiced on a decedent during the decedent's lifetime that affects the succession of the decedent's estate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1977–2006 · leading case: Williams v. Williams, 129 P.3d 428 (Alaska 2006).
Williams v. Williams, 129 P.3d 428 (Alaska 2006). “The daughter Christina appeals, arguing that (1) her suit was timely because the statutes of limitations for her claims should have been tolled under the doctrine of equitable estoppel; and (2) her suit was timely under the statutory fraud discovery provision of AS 13.06.030. We…”
Engebreth v. Moore, 567 P.2d 305 (Alaska 1977). “Arthur and Ruth Engebreth and Hitchinrail Duplex Apartments 1 have appealed from a superior court order dismissing their complaint which was grounded in part on AS 13.06.030 of the Uniform Probate Code as adopted in Alaska.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.