Alaska Stat. » Chapter 13.26
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 13.26.113 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Secs. 13.26.113 — 13.26.120. [Renumbered as AS 13.26.251, 13.26.256, 13.26.261, 13.26.266, 13.26.271, 13.26.276, and 13.26.281.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). · cites it 8× “See AS 13.26.113(e, f). If a person "is able to perform some, but not all, of the functions necessary to care for" herself, "the court may appoint a partial guardian, but may not appoint a full guardian.”
In re the Prot. Proceedings of M.K., 278 P.3d 876 (Alaska 2012). · cites it 4× “the decision to "determine in what community she lives" under AS 13.26.113(e). MK., acting through counsel, filed a statement of her "position with respect to the court's findings" on September 10, 2009.”
Matter of OSD, 672 P.2d 1304 (Alaska 1983). · cites it 2× “AS 13.26.113, which sets out the requirements that must be met before a court can appoint a full guardian, provides in pertinent part: (a) At the hearing scheduled under AS 13.”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 3× “He cites AS 13.26.113 in support. 30 CPS responds that S.”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 3× “He cites AS 13.26.113 in support. [30] CPS responds that S.”
In the Matter of the Prot. Proceedings of: v. Freddy A. (Alaska 2012). “36 AS 13.26.113(g), (h). 37 The focus on Freddy is justified, moreover, because of the substantial effect that an appointment of a guardian has on Freddy’s individual liberties.”
M.A. (Mother) v. State of Alaska, OCS (Alaska 2012). “11 AS 13.26.113(b) (“The burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence is upon the petitioner, and a determination of incapacity shall be made before consideration of proper disposition.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.113(a)(6) — 2 cases
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “He cites AS 13.26.113 in support. 30 CPS responds that S.”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “He cites AS 13.26.113 in support. [30] CPS responds that S.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.113(b) — 2 cases
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). “See AS 13.26.113(e, f). If a person "is able to perform some, but not all, of the functions necessary to care for" herself, "the court may appoint a partial guardian, but may not appoint a full guardian.”
M.A. (Mother) v. State of Alaska, OCS (Alaska 2012). “11 AS 13.26.113(b) (“The burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence is upon the petitioner, and a determination of incapacity shall be made before consideration of proper disposition.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.113(e) — 2 cases
In re the Prot. Proceedings of M.K., 278 P.3d 876 (Alaska 2012). “the decision to "determine in what community she lives" under AS 13.26.113(e). MK., acting through counsel, filed a statement of her "position with respect to the court's findings" on September 10, 2009.”
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). “See AS 13.26.113(e, f). If a person "is able to perform some, but not all, of the functions necessary to care for" herself, "the court may appoint a partial guardian, but may not appoint a full guardian.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.113(f) — 1 case
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). “See AS 13.26.113(e, f). If a person "is able to perform some, but not all, of the functions necessary to care for" herself, "the court may appoint a partial guardian, but may not appoint a full guardian.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.113(g) — 2 cases
Wilson v. State, Dep't of Law, 355 P.3d 549 (Alaska 2015). “See AS 13.26.113(e, f). If a person "is able to perform some, but not all, of the functions necessary to care for" herself, "the court may appoint a partial guardian, but may not appoint a full guardian.”
In the Matter of the Prot. Proceedings of: v. Freddy A. (Alaska 2012). “36 AS 13.26.113(g), (h). 37 The focus on Freddy is justified, moreover, because of the substantial effect that an appointment of a guardian has on Freddy’s individual liberties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.