Alaska Stat. » Chapter 13.26
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 13.26.280 (2026)

[Renumbered as

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 13.26.280. [Renumbered as AS 13.26.540.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1995–2005 · leading case: Trapp v. State, Off. of Pub. Advocacy, 112 P.3d 668 (Alaska 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Trapp v. State, Off. of Pub. Advocacy, 112 P.3d 668 (Alaska 2005). · cites it 5× “After a hearing, the superior court entered an order appointing OPA as conservator “with the powers and duties set forth in AS 13.26.280 and as set out in the conservatorship plan.”
Gunter v. Kathy-O-Estates, 87 P.3d 65 (Alaska 2004). “We have established that a properly appointed conservator has the authority to settle a lawsuit under AS 13.26.280(c)(19). 22 Therefore, CAPA's dis *72 missal of Gunter's challenge to the C & R can be challenged on only two grounds on appeal: (1) that CAPA was improperly…”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 2× “We conclude, however, that AS 13.26.280(c)(19) gives a conservator authority to settle a lawsuit.”
First Nat'l Bank of Anchorage v. State, Off. of Pub. Advocacy, 902 P.2d 330 (Alaska 1995). “AS 13.26.280. 2 . As noted in footnote 1, AS 13.”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). · cites it 2× “We conclude, however, that AS 13.26.280(c)(19) gives a conservator authority to settle a lawsuit.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.280(a) — 1 case
Trapp v. State, Off. of Pub. Advocacy, 112 P.3d 668 (Alaska 2005). “After a hearing, the superior court entered an order appointing OPA as conservator “with the powers and duties set forth in AS 13.26.280 and as set out in the conservatorship plan.”
— Alaska Stat. § 13.26.280(c)(19) — 3 cases
Gunter v. Kathy-O-Estates, 87 P.3d 65 (Alaska 2004). “We have established that a properly appointed conservator has the authority to settle a lawsuit under AS 13.26.280(c)(19). 22 Therefore, CAPA's dis *72 missal of Gunter's challenge to the C & R can be challenged on only two grounds on appeal: (1) that CAPA was improperly…”
In re of S.H., 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “We conclude, however, that AS 13.26.280(c)(19) gives a conservator authority to settle a lawsuit.”
In Re Sh, 987 P.2d 735 (Alaska 1999). “We conclude, however, that AS 13.26.280(c)(19) gives a conservator authority to settle a lawsuit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.