Alaska Stat. » Chapter 15.45
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 15.45.240 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 15.45.240. Judicial review.
Any person aggrieved by a determination made by the lieutenant governor under AS 15.45.010 — 15.45.220 may bring an action in the superior court to have the determination reviewed within 30 days of the date on which notice of the determination was given.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: McAlpine v. Univ. of Alaska, 762 P.2d 81 (Alaska 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McAlpine v. Univ. of Alaska, 762 P.2d 81 (Alaska 1988). · cites it 18× “The questions presented are (1) whether the thirty-day statute of limitations contained in AS 15.45.240 barred the University’s challenge of the initiative; (2) whether the initiative would make an appropriation; and (3) whether the initiative is too vague to enact a law.”
Boucher v. Engstrom, 528 P.2d 456 (Alaska 1974). · cites it 7× “Boucher first argues that Engs-trom’s action is barred by AS 15.45.240, the statutory provision for judicial review of the lieutenant governor’s determination.”
Ulmer v. Alaska Restaurant & Beverage Ass'n, 33 P.3d 773 (Alaska 2001). · cites it 2× “AS 15.45.240 provides that "[ainy person aggrieved by a determination made by the lieutenant governor under AS 15.”
Kevin Meyer, Lieutenant Governor of the State of Alaska & State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Alaskans for Better Elections, 465 P.3d 477 (Alaska 2020). “continued) be subject to judicial review”); AS 15.45.240 (authorizing superior court action to review lieutenant governor’s determination).”
State v. Trust the People, 113 P.3d 613 (Alaska 2005). “210: If the lieutenant' governor, with the formal concurrence of the attorney general, determines that an act of the legislature that is substantially the same as the proposed law was enacted after the petition had been filed, and before the date of the election, the petition is…”
Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. Kritz, 3 P.3d 906 (Alaska 2000). “4 The lHeutenant governor rejected Jacobus's proposed language and notified him that un *910 der AS 15.45.240 any person aggrieved by the determination could bring a superior court action for review of the ballot language within thirty days.”
Burgess v. Alaska Lieutenant Governor Terry Miller, 654 P.2d 273 (Alaska 1982). “AS 15.45.240. The initiative in question reads as follows: AN INITIATIVE For an Act entitled: “An Act relating to individual equality for personal consumptive users of fish and game, and to repeal existing laws relating to subsistence use of fish and game.”
Warren v. Boucher, 543 P.2d 731 (Alaska 1975). · cites it 2× “"All executive and administrative offices, departments, and agencies of the state government and their respective functions, powers, and duties shall be allocated by law among and within not more than twenty principal departments, so as to group them as far as practicable…”
State of Alaska, Off. of Lieutenant Governor, Div. of Elections, & Kevin Meyer, in an Off. capacity v. Vote Yes for Alaska's Fair Share, 478 P.3d 679 (Alaska 2021). · cites it 3× “AS 15.45.240. -3- 7499 shall be the difference between the average monthly Production Tax Value of a barrel of oil and $50, multiplied by the volume of taxable oil produced by the producer for the month, multiplied by 15 percent.”
La Quen Naay Elizabeth Med. Crow, Amber Lee, & Kevin Mcgee v. Dir. Carol Beecher, in her Off. Capacity, Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, in her Off. Capacity, & the State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Dr. Arthur Matthias, Phillip Izon, & Jamie R. Donley (Alaska 2025). “5 The complaint was filed pursuant to AS 15.45.240, which provides: “Any person aggrieved by a determination made by the lieutenant governor under AS 15.”
La Quen Naay Elizabeth Med. Crow, Amber Lee, & Kevin Mcgee v. Dir. Carol Beecher, in her Off. Capacity, Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, in her Off. Capacity, & the State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Dr. Arthur Matthias, Phillip Izon, & Jamie R. Donley (Alaska 2025). “5 The complaint was filed pursuant to AS 15.45.240, which provides: “Any person aggrieved by a determination made by the lieutenant governor under AS 15.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.