Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 22.10.025 (2026)
Powers of superior court in action for divorce, separation, or child support
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 22.10.025. Powers of superior court in action for divorce, separation, or child support.
(a) The superior court, in an action for divorce, separation, or child support affecting inalienable stock in a corporation organized under 43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq. (Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act), may order the stock transferred to the spouse, a child, or a guardian or custodian for a child, but may not order it sold on the open market or transferred to other persons.
(b) The superior court, in an action for divorce, separation, or child support, may issue orders to aid in the enforcement of child support, including orders requiring an individual who owes support under an order of support to
(1) make payments according to an approved payment plan;
(2) participate in appropriate work activities if the individual is not incapacitated; or
(3) complete and submit an application for a permanent fund dividend under AS 43.23.015 or provide proof to the agency or the court that the individual is not eligible for a dividend in a given year.
(a) The superior court, in an action for divorce, separation, or child support affecting inalienable stock in a corporation organized under 43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq. (Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act), may order the stock transferred to the spouse, a child, or a guardian or custodian for a child, but may not order it sold on the open market or transferred to other persons.
(b) The superior court, in an action for divorce, separation, or child support, may issue orders to aid in the enforcement of child support, including orders requiring an individual who owes support under an order of support to
(1) make payments according to an approved payment plan;
(2) participate in appropriate work activities if the individual is not incapacitated; or
(3) complete and submit an application for a permanent fund dividend under AS 43.23.015 or provide proof to the agency or the court that the individual is not eligible for a dividend in a given year.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: Adam M v. Christina B (Alaska 2013).
Adam M v. Christina B (Alaska 2013). “160 or AS 22.10.025 to adjudicate Christina’s tort claim in their divorce action; (2) Christina failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under AS 25.”
Jett M. Million v. Diane L. Hubert (Alaska 2026). “40 However, allocation of these benefits at divorce becomes legally permissible when a service member agrees to divide them as part of a valid contract — such as the settlement agreement here between Million and Hubert.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.