Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 23.10.380 (2026)

Right to return transportation

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 23.10.380. Right to return transportation.
 (a) An employer who furnishes, finances, agrees to furnish or finance, or in any way provides transportation for a person from the place of hire to a point inside or outside the state to employ the person shall provide the person with return transportation to the place of hire from which transportation was furnished or financed, or to a destination agreed upon by the parties, with transportation to be furnished or financed
     (1) on or after the termination of employment for a cause considered good and sufficient by the department, beyond the control of the person, or on or after the termination of the contract of employment or a renewal of the contract; and

     (2) upon the request of the person or the department made within 45 days after the termination of employment.

 (b) Upon the termination of employment the subsistence of the employee may not continue longer than 10 days after the termination or until transportation is available, whichever occurs first.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–1989 · leading case: Vail v. Coffman Engineers, Inc., 778 P.2d 211 (Alaska 1989).
Vail v. Coffman Engineers, Inc., 778 P.2d 211 (Alaska 1989). · cites it 13× “The Department argues that AS 23.10.380 is a remedial statute; therefore, it should be liberally construed.”
Jeffcoat v. State, Dep't of Labor, 732 P.2d 1073 (Alaska 1987). “140(d) and AS 23.10.380. 2 . [These "genuine issues" have since been resolved by stipulation of the parties.”
Alaska Stat. § 23.10.380(a): 1 case
Vail v. Coffman Engineers, Inc., 778 P.2d 211 (Alaska 1989). “The Department argues that AS 23.10.380 is a remedial statute; therefore, it should be liberally construed.”
Alaska Stat. § 23.10.380(b): 1 case
Vail v. Coffman Engineers, Inc., 778 P.2d 211 (Alaska 1989). “The Department argues that AS 23.10.380 is a remedial statute; therefore, it should be liberally construed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.