Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 25.25.010 (2026)
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1975–1998 · leading case: Saask v. Yandell, 702 P.2d 1327 (Alaska 1985).
Saask v. Yandell, 702 P.2d 1327 (Alaska 1985). “Under his view, only those with legal custody may proceed under URESA to seek reimbursement from a parent for providing support for that parent’s child, regardless of the propriety or the necessity of the situation in which support was provided.”
Yute Air Alaska, Inc. v. McAlpine, 698 P.2d 1173 (Alaska 1985). “, AS 25.25.010 et seq. (Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act); AS 32.”
Child Support Enf't Div. of Alaska v. Brenckle, 675 N.E.2d 390 (Mass. 1997). “On June 30, 1992, Carol Brenckle filed a petition in Alaska under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), Alaska Stat. §§ 25.25.010 — 25.25.100 (since re *217 pealed), seeking to establish an enforcement order in Massachusetts, Brenckle’s home State.”
Pub. Def. Agency v. Superior Court, Third Jud. Dist., 534 P.2d 947 (Alaska 1975). “; and through its participation under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, AS 25.25.010 et seq. It has also set up a program whereby the court trustee monitors payments under support orders, and takes steps preliminary to formal contempt proceedings to encourage…”
State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enf't Div. Ex Rel. Inman v. Dean, 902 P.2d 1321 (Alaska 1995). “In May 1982, CSED filed a complaint in an Alaskan court under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), AS 25.25.010 et seq., seeking to have an Oregon court recognize the support order against Dean.”
State of Alaska Ex Rel. Sweat v. Hansen, 782 P.2d 50 (Idaho Ct. App. 1989). “and Alaska Stat. § 25.25.010 et seq. Alaska sought partial reimbursement of public assistance provided to the child’s mother, Cheri Sweat.”
State, Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enf't Div. Ex Rel. Wallace v. Delaney, 962 P.2d 187 (Alaska 1998). “See former AS 25.25.010— 25.25.270 (repealed 1995). This legislation “was intended as a means to improve the enforcement of child support obligations when parents cross state lines.”
Bailey v. Haas, 655 P.2d 764 (Alaska 1982). “See AS 25.25.010(6) and AS 25.25.080. 4 . Civil Rule 82(a)(2) states: “(2) In actions where the money judgment is not an accurate criteria [sic] for determining the fee to be allowed to the prevailing side, the court shall award a fee commensurate with the amount and value of…”
State v. Superior Court, Fourth Jud. Dist., 718 P.2d 466 (Alaska 1986). “This petition for review arises out of a Petition from the State of Maine, filed in *467 Alaska under AS 25.25.010 — .270, the Alaska Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act.”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.25.010(2) — 1 case
Saask v. Yandell, 702 P.2d 1327 (Alaska 1985). “Under his view, only those with legal custody may proceed under URESA to seek reimbursement from a parent for providing support for that parent’s child, regardless of the propriety or the necessity of the situation in which support was provided.”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.25.010(4) — 1 case
Saask v. Yandell, 702 P.2d 1327 (Alaska 1985). “Under his view, only those with legal custody may proceed under URESA to seek reimbursement from a parent for providing support for that parent’s child, regardless of the propriety or the necessity of the situation in which support was provided.”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.25.010(6) — 2 cases
Saask v. Yandell, 702 P.2d 1327 (Alaska 1985). “Under his view, only those with legal custody may proceed under URESA to seek reimbursement from a parent for providing support for that parent’s child, regardless of the propriety or the necessity of the situation in which support was provided.”
Bailey v. Haas, 655 P.2d 764 (Alaska 1982). “See AS 25.25.010(6) and AS 25.25.080. 4 . Civil Rule 82(a)(2) states: “(2) In actions where the money judgment is not an accurate criteria [sic] for determining the fee to be allowed to the prevailing side, the court shall award a fee commensurate with the amount and value of…”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.25.010(8) — 1 case
Saask v. Yandell, 702 P.2d 1327 (Alaska 1985). “Under his view, only those with legal custody may proceed under URESA to seek reimbursement from a parent for providing support for that parent’s child, regardless of the propriety or the necessity of the situation in which support was provided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.