Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 28.15.121 (2026)
Restricted driver's license
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 28.15.121. Restricted driver's license.
(a) The department, upon issuing a driver's license, may for good cause impose restrictions suitable to the licensee's driving ability with respect to special mechanical control devices required on a motor vehicle that the licensee drives. The department may impose other restrictions applicable to the licensee that it determines to be appropriate to assure the safe operation of a motor vehicle by the licensee.
(b) The department may issue a special restricted license or may set out restrictions on the usual license form.
(c) The department may, upon receiving satisfactory evidence of a violation of the restrictions on a license restricted or issued under this section, suspend the restricted license for a period not to exceed 30 days.
(d) A person may not drive a motor vehicle in violation of the restrictions imposed on a restricted license.
(a) The department, upon issuing a driver's license, may for good cause impose restrictions suitable to the licensee's driving ability with respect to special mechanical control devices required on a motor vehicle that the licensee drives. The department may impose other restrictions applicable to the licensee that it determines to be appropriate to assure the safe operation of a motor vehicle by the licensee.
(b) The department may issue a special restricted license or may set out restrictions on the usual license form.
(c) The department may, upon receiving satisfactory evidence of a violation of the restrictions on a license restricted or issued under this section, suspend the restricted license for a period not to exceed 30 days.
(d) A person may not drive a motor vehicle in violation of the restrictions imposed on a restricted license.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1986–1986 · leading case: Alexander v. State, 712 P.2d 416 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986).
Alexander v. State, 712 P.2d 416 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). “We believe that this conclusion, in turn, compels a finding that the notice provisions of AS 28.15.121 are valid, since a person who has not received actual notice under this statute will not be precluded from presenting a defense based upon reasonable failure to know of his…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.