Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 36.30.250 (2026)

Award of contract

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 36.30.250. Award of contract.
 (a) The procurement officer shall award a contract under competitive sealed proposals to the responsible and responsive offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the state taking into consideration price and the evaluation factors set out in the request for proposals. Other factors and criteria may not be used in the evaluation. The contract file must contain the basis on which the award is made.

 (b) [Repealed, § 26 ch 59 SLA 2013.]
 (c) Notwithstanding (a) of this section, the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities may include factors in addition to price as evaluation factors when awarding a construction manager general contractor contract under AS 36.30.309.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2010 · leading case: Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage Sch. Dist., 118 P.3d 1018 (Alaska 2005).
Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage Sch. Dist., 118 P.3d 1018 (Alaska 2005). “See AS 36.30.250. 14 . See AS 36.30.560-.680.”
Kila, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Admin., 876 P.2d 1102 (Alaska 1994). · cites it 3× “In determining an award of contract, a procurement officer’s initial duty is as follows: The procurement officer shall award a contract under competitive sealed proposals to the responsible and responsive offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most…”
Weed v. Bachner Co. Inc., 230 P.3d 697 (Alaska 2010). · cites it 2× “[25] AS 36.30.250. [26] Aspen Exploration Corp.”
— Alaska Stat. § 36.30.250(a) — 1 case
Kila, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Admin., 876 P.2d 1102 (Alaska 1994). “In determining an award of contract, a procurement officer’s initial duty is as follows: The procurement officer shall award a contract under competitive sealed proposals to the responsible and responsive offeror whose proposal is determined in writing to be the most…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.