Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 36.30.585 (2026)
Protest remedies
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 36.30.585. Protest remedies.
(a) If the procurement officer sustains a protest in whole or in part, the procurement officer shall implement an appropriate remedy.
(b) In determining an appropriate remedy, the procurement officer shall consider the circumstances surrounding the solicitation or procurement including the seriousness of the procurement deficiencies, the degree of prejudice to other interested parties or to the integrity of the procurement system, the good faith of the parties, the extent the procurement has been accomplished, costs to the agency and other impacts on the agency of a proposed remedy, and the urgency of the procurement to the welfare of the state.
(c) Notwithstanding (a) and (b) of this section, if a protest is sustained in whole or part, the protester's damages are limited to reasonable bid or proposal preparation costs.
(a) If the procurement officer sustains a protest in whole or in part, the procurement officer shall implement an appropriate remedy.
(b) In determining an appropriate remedy, the procurement officer shall consider the circumstances surrounding the solicitation or procurement including the seriousness of the procurement deficiencies, the degree of prejudice to other interested parties or to the integrity of the procurement system, the good faith of the parties, the extent the procurement has been accomplished, costs to the agency and other impacts on the agency of a proposed remedy, and the urgency of the procurement to the welfare of the state.
(c) Notwithstanding (a) and (b) of this section, if a protest is sustained in whole or part, the protester's damages are limited to reasonable bid or proposal preparation costs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2000–2004 · leading case: Wilson v. Los Angeles Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth., 1 P.3d 63 (Cal. 2000).
Wilson v. Los Angeles Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth., 1 P.3d 63 (Cal. 2000). “(g) [“protesting bidder or offeror may be entitled to the reasonable costs incurred in connection with the solicitation, including bid preparation costs, through the commission”]; Colorado: Colo.”
Miami-dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. J. Ruiz Sch. Bus Serv., Inc., 874 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). “(g) ["protesting bidder or offeror may be entitled to the reasonable costs incurred in connection with the solicitation, including bid preparation costs, through the commission"]; Colorado: Colo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.