Alaska Stat. » Chapter 37.05
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 37.05.230 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Secs. 37.05.230 — 37.05.280. Competitive bids; contracts; leases. [Repealed, § 67 ch 106 SLA 1986. For current provisions, see AS 36.30.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1983–1989 · leading case: Irby-Northface v. Commonwealth Elec. Co., 664 P.2d 557 (Alaska 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Irby-Northface v. Commonwealth Elec. Co., 664 P.2d 557 (Alaska 1983). · cites it 17× “The single issue that must be addressed to resolve this appeal and cross-appeal is whether a joint venture qualifies as an Alaska bidder under the Alaska bidder preference statute, AS 37.05.230, when only one of its venturers would individually qualify as an Alaska bidder.”
State v. N. Bus Co., Inc., 693 P.2d 319 (Alaska 1984). · cites it 7× “085, 3 and violated the competitive bid statute, AS 37.05.230, 4 which expressly exempts school busing contracts from the competitive bid criteria.”
State v. Johnson, 779 P.2d 778 (Alaska 1989). · cites it 2× “The department shall determine the responsibility of the bidder based upon the bidder’s (1) adherence to the bid specifications, (2) proposed terms of delivery, (3) compliance with state laws, (4) performance record, (5) financial capability, and (6) compliance with conditions…”
Alaska Stat. § 37.05.230(2): 1 case
State v. Johnson, 779 P.2d 778 (Alaska 1989). “The department shall determine the responsibility of the bidder based upon the bidder’s (1) adherence to the bid specifications, (2) proposed terms of delivery, (3) compliance with state laws, (4) performance record, (5) financial capability, and (6) compliance with conditions…”
Alaska Stat. § 37.05.230(4): 1 case
State v. N. Bus Co., Inc., 693 P.2d 319 (Alaska 1984). “085, 3 and violated the competitive bid statute, AS 37.05.230, 4 which expressly exempts school busing contracts from the competitive bid criteria.”
Alaska Stat. § 37.05.230(5): 1 case
Irby-Northface v. Commonwealth Elec. Co., 664 P.2d 557 (Alaska 1983). “The single issue that must be addressed to resolve this appeal and cross-appeal is whether a joint venture qualifies as an Alaska bidder under the Alaska bidder preference statute, AS 37.05.230, when only one of its venturers would individually qualify as an Alaska bidder.”
Alaska Stat. § 37.05.230(5)(a): 1 case
Irby-Northface v. Commonwealth Elec. Co., 664 P.2d 557 (Alaska 1983). “The single issue that must be addressed to resolve this appeal and cross-appeal is whether a joint venture qualifies as an Alaska bidder under the Alaska bidder preference statute, AS 37.05.230, when only one of its venturers would individually qualify as an Alaska bidder.”
Alaska Stat. § 37.05.230(5)(c): 1 case
Irby-Northface v. Commonwealth Elec. Co., 664 P.2d 557 (Alaska 1983). “The single issue that must be addressed to resolve this appeal and cross-appeal is whether a joint venture qualifies as an Alaska bidder under the Alaska bidder preference statute, AS 37.05.230, when only one of its venturers would individually qualify as an Alaska bidder.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.