Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 38.35.130 (2026)

Right-of-way easements or leases acquired from others

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 38.35.130. Right-of-way easements or leases acquired from others.
 (a) The lessee may, if the commissioner delegates the function to it, condemn, by declaration of taking, under AS 09.55.420 — 09.55.450, real property and acquire leases of or easements or rights-of-way on land in the state required for right-of-way purposes for a pipeline subject to the lease on behalf of and as agent for the state in which title to or interest in the land shall vest.

 (b) The lease shall contain a covenant that the land, right-of-way, or easement acquired under this section is or will form part of the land leased to the lessee.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1975–1987 · leading case: Arco Pipeline Co. v. 3.60 Acres, 539 P.2d 64 (Alaska 1975).
Arco Pipeline Co. v. 3.60 Acres, 539 P.2d 64 (Alaska 1975). · cites it 4× “In order to facilitate the prompt completion of this monumental and historic project, the State of Alaska in AS 38.35.130 authorized a delegation of its power of eminent domain and permitted thereby the use by petitioners of a declaration of taking to condemn real property in…”
Heffle v. State, 633 P.2d 264 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 2× “Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, as agent for the state under AS 38.35.130, obtained a right-of-way agreement from Etalook for the Haul Road on May 27, 1975.”
Ostrem v. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co., 648 P.2d 986 (Alaska 1982). “See AS 38.35.130; AS 09.55.240—.460; ARCO Pipeline Co.”
Etalook v. Exxon Pipeline Co., 831 F.2d 1440 (9th Cir. 1987). “See Alaska Stat. § 38.35.130 (1984). We affirm the district court’s holding that the appellees obtained title to the rights of way through the formal condemnation proceedings mandated by § 357.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.