Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 41.15.045 (2026)
Civil immunity
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 41.15.045. Civil immunity.
(a) Notwithstanding other provisions of law, a person may not bring a civil action for damages for death, personal injury, or property damage that results from an act or omission in performing or failing to perform activities or duties arising out of prevention, monitoring, control, or suppression of fires authorized to be performed under AS 41.15.010 — 41.15.170 against
(1) the state or its officers, agents, and employees;
(2) a political subdivision of the state or its officers, agents, and employees;
(3) any organization authorized to prevent, control, or suppress fires; or
(4) others assisting in the control or suppression of fires at the request of an officer or employee of the United States or the state.
(b) This section does not apply to a civil action for damages as a result of intentional misconduct within the course and scope of employment or agency and with complete disregard for the safety and property of others.
(a) Notwithstanding other provisions of law, a person may not bring a civil action for damages for death, personal injury, or property damage that results from an act or omission in performing or failing to perform activities or duties arising out of prevention, monitoring, control, or suppression of fires authorized to be performed under AS 41.15.010 — 41.15.170 against
(1) the state or its officers, agents, and employees;
(2) a political subdivision of the state or its officers, agents, and employees;
(3) any organization authorized to prevent, control, or suppress fires; or
(4) others assisting in the control or suppression of fires at the request of an officer or employee of the United States or the state.
(b) This section does not apply to a civil action for damages as a result of intentional misconduct within the course and scope of employment or agency and with complete disregard for the safety and property of others.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Brewer v. State, 341 P.3d 1107 (Alaska 2014).
Brewer v. State, 341 P.3d 1107 (Alaska 2014). “As for the constitutional claim, the superior court decided that the State's actions did not constitute a taking because they were a valid exercise of its police powers.”
Alaska Stat. § 41.15.045(a): 1 case
Brewer v. State, 341 P.3d 1107 (Alaska 2014). “As for the constitutional claim, the superior court decided that the State's actions did not constitute a taking because they were a valid exercise of its police powers.”
Alaska Stat. § 41.15.045(b): 1 case
Brewer v. State, 341 P.3d 1107 (Alaska 2014). “As for the constitutional claim, the superior court decided that the State's actions did not constitute a taking because they were a valid exercise of its police powers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.