Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577 (2026)
Enforcement by attorney general
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 45.50.577. Enforcement by attorney general.
(a) The attorney general may bring a civil action in superior court to secure monetary relief as provided in this section on behalf of the state and its agencies injured either directly or indirectly by reason of any violation of AS 45.50.562 — 45.50.570.
(b) The attorney general may bring a civil action in superior court in the name of the state, as parens patriae on behalf of governmental entities or persons doing business or residing in this state, to secure monetary relief as provided in this section for injuries directly or indirectly sustained by persons by reason of any violation of AS 45.50.562 — 45.50.570.
(c) The court shall exclude from the amount of monetary relief awarded in an action under (a) or (b) of this section any amount of monetary relief that
(1) duplicates amounts that have been awarded for the same injury; or
(2) is properly allocable to persons who have excluded their claims under (e) of this section.
(d) The court shall award the attorney general as monetary relief three times the total damage sustained as described in (a) or (b) of this section and, additionally, the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney fees.
(e) In any action brought under (b) of this section, the attorney general, at the times, in the manner, and with the content the court directs, shall cause notice of the action to be given by publication. Any governmental entity or person on whose behalf an action is brought under (b) of this section may elect to exclude from civil action the portion of the state claim for monetary relief attributable to that governmental entity or person by filing notice of the election with the court within the time specified in the attorney general's notice given in accordance with this subsection.
(f) The final judgment in an action under (a) or (b) of this section is res judicata as to any claim under AS 45.50.576 by any governmental entity or person on whose behalf the action was brought and who fails to give notice of election to exclude under (e) of this section within the period specified in the attorney general's notice given under (e) of this section.
(g) An action under (b) of this section may not be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the court, and notice of any proposed dismissal or compromise shall be given by publication at the times, in the manner, and with the content the court directs in accordance with (e) of this section and AS 45.50.584.
(h) Monetary relief recovered in an action under this section shall be (1) distributed in the manner the court, in its discretion, authorizes; or (2) deemed a civil penalty by the court and deposited in the general fund, and may be appropriated to the Alaska permanent fund (AS 37.13.010(a)) or for any other public purpose. A distribution procedure authorized by the court under this subsection must afford each governmental entity or person participating in the civil action a reasonable opportunity to secure that entity's or person's appropriate portion of the net monetary relief.
(i) Only the attorney general, in a suit brought under this section, may seek monetary relief for injury indirectly sustained for a violation of AS 45.50.562 — 45.50.570.
(a) The attorney general may bring a civil action in superior court to secure monetary relief as provided in this section on behalf of the state and its agencies injured either directly or indirectly by reason of any violation of AS 45.50.562 — 45.50.570.
(b) The attorney general may bring a civil action in superior court in the name of the state, as parens patriae on behalf of governmental entities or persons doing business or residing in this state, to secure monetary relief as provided in this section for injuries directly or indirectly sustained by persons by reason of any violation of AS 45.50.562 — 45.50.570.
(c) The court shall exclude from the amount of monetary relief awarded in an action under (a) or (b) of this section any amount of monetary relief that
(1) duplicates amounts that have been awarded for the same injury; or
(2) is properly allocable to persons who have excluded their claims under (e) of this section.
(d) The court shall award the attorney general as monetary relief three times the total damage sustained as described in (a) or (b) of this section and, additionally, the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney fees.
(e) In any action brought under (b) of this section, the attorney general, at the times, in the manner, and with the content the court directs, shall cause notice of the action to be given by publication. Any governmental entity or person on whose behalf an action is brought under (b) of this section may elect to exclude from civil action the portion of the state claim for monetary relief attributable to that governmental entity or person by filing notice of the election with the court within the time specified in the attorney general's notice given in accordance with this subsection.
(f) The final judgment in an action under (a) or (b) of this section is res judicata as to any claim under AS 45.50.576 by any governmental entity or person on whose behalf the action was brought and who fails to give notice of election to exclude under (e) of this section within the period specified in the attorney general's notice given under (e) of this section.
(g) An action under (b) of this section may not be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the court, and notice of any proposed dismissal or compromise shall be given by publication at the times, in the manner, and with the content the court directs in accordance with (e) of this section and AS 45.50.584.
(h) Monetary relief recovered in an action under this section shall be (1) distributed in the manner the court, in its discretion, authorizes; or (2) deemed a civil penalty by the court and deposited in the general fund, and may be appropriated to the Alaska permanent fund (AS 37.13.010(a)) or for any other public purpose. A distribution procedure authorized by the court under this subsection must afford each governmental entity or person participating in the civil action a reasonable opportunity to secure that entity's or person's appropriate portion of the net monetary relief.
(i) Only the attorney general, in a suit brought under this section, may seek monetary relief for injury indirectly sustained for a violation of AS 45.50.562 — 45.50.570.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007).
California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “, Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577 (a-b); Del.Code Ann.”
State v. LG Elec., Inc., 375 P.3d 636 (Wash. 2016). “§ 15c(a)(1); Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577 (b); Ark. Code Ann.”
Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc., 14 F.4th 1059 (9th Cir. 2021). “See Alaska Stat. Ann. § 45.50.577 (i); Ark. Code Ann.”
Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc., 613 F.3d 134 (3rd Cir. 2010). “The following states allow indirect purchaser recovery, but only in parens patriae suits brought by the state attorney general: Alaska ( Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577 (b)) Arkansas (Ark.”
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litig., 103 F. Supp. 3d 1155 (N.D. Cal. 2015). “Alaska Stat. Ann. § 45.50.577 (f) (“Only the attorney general, in a suit brought under this section, may seek monetary relief for injury indirectly sustained for a violation.”
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund v. Amgen Inc. (D. Del. 2022). “See Alaska Stat. Ann. § 45.50.577 (/). 44 legislatures and courts that adopted the M/inois Brick rule against indirect purchaser antitrust suits did not allow ‘an end run around the policies allowing only direct purchasers to recover.”
Miami Prods. & Chem. Co. v. Olin Corp. (W.D.N.Y. 2021). “As another federal district court recently explained, Alaska has passed a statute that partially repeals Illinois Brick—Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577(i), which allows the Alaska attorney general to “bring an antitrust claim for damages on behalf of indirect purchasers under Alaska’s…”
— Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577(i) — 1 case
Miami Prods. & Chem. Co. v. Olin Corp. (W.D.N.Y. 2021). “As another federal district court recently explained, Alaska has passed a statute that partially repeals Illinois Brick—Alaska Stat. § 45.50.577(i), which allows the Alaska attorney general to “bring an antitrust claim for damages on behalf of indirect purchasers under Alaska’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.