Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 46.04.080 (2026)
Catastrophic oil discharges
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 46.04.080. Catastrophic oil discharges.
(a) The commissioner or the adjutant general of the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs may request the governor to determine that an actual or imminent occurrence of a catastrophic oil discharge constitutes a disaster emergency under AS 26.23. The commissioner and the adjutant general of the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs shall respond appropriately in the relief of the actual or imminent discharge under the relevant provisions of the applicable incident command system.
(b) The department shall promptly, under AS 46.04.010, seek reimbursement of oil discharge cleanup or containment expenses incurred as a result of an actual or imminent catastrophic oil discharge under AS 26.23.050.
(a) The commissioner or the adjutant general of the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs may request the governor to determine that an actual or imminent occurrence of a catastrophic oil discharge constitutes a disaster emergency under AS 26.23. The commissioner and the adjutant general of the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs shall respond appropriately in the relief of the actual or imminent discharge under the relevant provisions of the applicable incident command system.
(b) The department shall promptly, under AS 46.04.010, seek reimbursement of oil discharge cleanup or containment expenses incurred as a result of an actual or imminent catastrophic oil discharge under AS 26.23.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Lakosh v. Alaska Dep't of Env't Conservation, 49 P.3d 1111 (Alaska 2002).
Lakosh v. Alaska Dep't of Env't Conservation, 49 P.3d 1111 (Alaska 2002). “Lakosh filed a declaratory judgment action in superior court, challenging the new definition of best available technology as inconsistent with the underlying statutory requirements set out in AS 46.04.080(e). Superior Court Judge John Reese granted summary judgment in favor of…”
Alaska Stat. § 46.04.080(e): 1 case
Lakosh v. Alaska Dep't of Env't Conservation, 49 P.3d 1111 (Alaska 2002). “Lakosh filed a declaratory judgment action in superior court, challenging the new definition of best available technology as inconsistent with the underlying statutory requirements set out in AS 46.04.080(e). Superior Court Judge John Reese granted summary judgment in favor of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.