Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 47.10.083 (2026)

Review of orders, requests for extensions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 47.10.083. Review of orders, requests for extensions.
In a review under AS 47.10.080(f) and in a hearing related to a request for extended commitment or extended supervision under AS 47.10.080(c)(1) or (2), the court shall, in addition to the requirements of those provisions and the requirements of court rules, determine whether a child continues to be a child in need of aid at the time of the review or hearing. The court may not continue or extend state custody or supervision of the child unless the court finds that the child continues to be a child in need of aid except that, if the child is no longer a child in need of aid, the court may establish a specific timetable for gradual reunification of the family and termination of state custody or supervision if the court makes a finding that immediate reunification would be detrimental to the child.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1987–2018 · leading case: State, Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs. v. Michelle P, 411 P.3d 576 (Alaska 2018).
State, Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs. v. Michelle P, 411 P.3d 576 (Alaska 2018). · cites it 5× “100, AS 47.10.083 further clarifies that in a permanency hearing or in a hearing related to a request for extended commitment or extended supervision: [T]he court shall, in addition to the requirements of those provisions [governing those types of hearings] and the requirements…”
Thea G. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 291 P.3d 957 (Alaska 2013). · cites it 2× “With regard to state law, see AS 47.10.083 (gradual reunification); AS 47.”
Danielle A. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 215 P.3d 349 (Alaska 2009). · cites it 3× “AS 47.10.083; 32 . See AS 47.10.080(c)(1)(A); CINA Rule 19.”
In re A.S., 740 P.2d 432 (Alaska 1987). · cites it 3× “Northway further argues that AS 47.10.083 governs the determination of whether A.”
Matter of As, 740 P.2d 432 (Alaska 1987). · cites it 3× “Northway further argues that AS 47.10.083 governs the determination of whether A.”
F.T. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Div. of Fam. & Youth Servs., 922 P.2d 277 (Alaska 1996). · cites it 3× “083; CIÑA Rule 19(f); see also 1990 Senate Journal 3431. 2 In this case, the trial court correctly concluded that R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.