Alaska Stat. » Chapter 47.10
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 47.10.230 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Secs. 47.10.230 — 47.10.260. Care of children. [Repealed, § 55 ch 59 SLA 1996. For current law, see AS 47.14.100 — 47.14.130.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1981–1992 · leading case: E. A. v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
E. A. v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 5× “and requested a hearing de novo pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act 1 and AS 47.10.230(e). The superi- or court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
D.E.D. v. State, 704 P.2d 774 (Alaska 1985). · cites it 3× “Alaska Statutes § 47.10.230). The guidelines recommend that the parties to such agreements explicitly provide for return of the child upon demand if they do not wish the Act to apply to such placements.”
In re W.E.G., 710 P.2d 410 (Alaska 1985). · cites it 4× “As discussed below, we conclude that: (1) AS 47.10.230(e) does not entitle the grandparents to an adoption preference; (2) the adoption statute as applied does not violate equal protection; (3) the inescapable language of the adoption statute precludes granting post-adoption…”
C.G.A. v. State, 824 P.2d 1364 (Alaska 1992). · cites it 3× “” However, AS 47.10.230(b) states, in part, The department may pay the costs of maintenance which are necessary to assure adequate care of the child, and may accept funds from the federal government that are granted to assist in carrying out the purposes of this chapter, or that…”
Matter of WEG, 710 P.2d 410 (Alaska 1985). · cites it 5× “As discussed below, we conclude that: (1) AS 47.10.230(e) does not entitle the grandparents to an adoption preference; (2) the adoption statute as applied does not violate equal protection; (3) the inescapable language of the adoption statute precludes granting post-adoption…”
Matter of E.A.O., 816 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1991). · cites it 3× “The department notes that other sections of the statute authorize it to pay maintenance costs and to apply for medicaid benefits when a child is placed in a foster home, AS 47.10.230(b), and require it to pay for the medical expenses of handicapped foster children, AS 47.”
DED v. State, 704 P.2d 774 (Alaska 1985). · cites it 3× “Alaska Statutes § 47.10.230). The guidelines recommend that the parties to such agreements explicitly provide for return of the child upon demand if they do not wish the Act to apply to such placements.”
In Re Jrs, 690 P.2d 10 (Alaska 1984). “[12] In Alaska, blood relatives of Native parents have two sets of rights: those given by AS 47.10.230(e) ("A child may not be placed in a foster home or in the care of an agency or institution providing care for children if a blood relative exists who requests custody of the…”
EA v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 6× “and requested a hearing de novo pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act [1] and AS 47.10.230(e). The superior court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
In Re Eao, 816 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1991). · cites it 4× “The department notes that other sections of the statute authorize it to pay maintenance costs and to apply for medicaid benefits when a child is placed in a foster home, AS 47.10.230(b), and require it to pay for the medical expenses of handicapped foster children, AS 47.”
CGA v. State, 824 P.2d 1364 (Alaska 1992). · cites it 3× “" However, AS 47.10.230(b) states, in part, The department may pay the costs of maintenance which are necessary to assure adequate care of the child, and may accept funds from the federal government that are granted to assist in carrying out the purposes of this chapter, or that…”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.230(b) — 4 cases
C.G.A. v. State, 824 P.2d 1364 (Alaska 1992). “” However, AS 47.10.230(b) states, in part, The department may pay the costs of maintenance which are necessary to assure adequate care of the child, and may accept funds from the federal government that are granted to assist in carrying out the purposes of this chapter, or that…”
Matter of E.A.O., 816 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1991). “The department notes that other sections of the statute authorize it to pay maintenance costs and to apply for medicaid benefits when a child is placed in a foster home, AS 47.10.230(b), and require it to pay for the medical expenses of handicapped foster children, AS 47.”
CGA v. State, 824 P.2d 1364 (Alaska 1992). “" However, AS 47.10.230(b) states, in part, The department may pay the costs of maintenance which are necessary to assure adequate care of the child, and may accept funds from the federal government that are granted to assist in carrying out the purposes of this chapter, or that…”
In Re Eao, 816 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1991). “The department notes that other sections of the statute authorize it to pay maintenance costs and to apply for medicaid benefits when a child is placed in a foster home, AS 47.10.230(b), and require it to pay for the medical expenses of handicapped foster children, AS 47.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.230(c) — 2 cases
D.E.D. v. State, 704 P.2d 774 (Alaska 1985). “Alaska Statutes § 47.10.230). The guidelines recommend that the parties to such agreements explicitly provide for return of the child upon demand if they do not wish the Act to apply to such placements.”
DED v. State, 704 P.2d 774 (Alaska 1985). “Alaska Statutes § 47.10.230). The guidelines recommend that the parties to such agreements explicitly provide for return of the child upon demand if they do not wish the Act to apply to such placements.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.230(d) — 2 cases
Matter of E.A.O., 816 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1991). “The department notes that other sections of the statute authorize it to pay maintenance costs and to apply for medicaid benefits when a child is placed in a foster home, AS 47.10.230(b), and require it to pay for the medical expenses of handicapped foster children, AS 47.”
In Re Eao, 816 P.2d 1352 (Alaska 1991). “The department notes that other sections of the statute authorize it to pay maintenance costs and to apply for medicaid benefits when a child is placed in a foster home, AS 47.10.230(b), and require it to pay for the medical expenses of handicapped foster children, AS 47.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.230(e) — 5 cases
In re W.E.G., 710 P.2d 410 (Alaska 1985). “As discussed below, we conclude that: (1) AS 47.10.230(e) does not entitle the grandparents to an adoption preference; (2) the adoption statute as applied does not violate equal protection; (3) the inescapable language of the adoption statute precludes granting post-adoption…”
E. A. v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981). “and requested a hearing de novo pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act 1 and AS 47.10.230(e). The superi- or court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
Matter of WEG, 710 P.2d 410 (Alaska 1985). “As discussed below, we conclude that: (1) AS 47.10.230(e) does not entitle the grandparents to an adoption preference; (2) the adoption statute as applied does not violate equal protection; (3) the inescapable language of the adoption statute precludes granting post-adoption…”
In Re Jrs, 690 P.2d 10 (Alaska 1984). “[12] In Alaska, blood relatives of Native parents have two sets of rights: those given by AS 47.10.230(e) ("A child may not be placed in a foster home or in the care of an agency or institution providing care for children if a blood relative exists who requests custody of the…”
EA v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981). “and requested a hearing de novo pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act [1] and AS 47.10.230(e). The superior court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
— Alaska Stat. § 47.10.230(f) — 3 cases
E. A. v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981). “and requested a hearing de novo pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act 1 and AS 47.10.230(e). The superi- or court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
Matter of WEG, 710 P.2d 410 (Alaska 1985). “As discussed below, we conclude that: (1) AS 47.10.230(e) does not entitle the grandparents to an adoption preference; (2) the adoption statute as applied does not violate equal protection; (3) the inescapable language of the adoption statute precludes granting post-adoption…”
EA v. State, 623 P.2d 1210 (Alaska 1981). “and requested a hearing de novo pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act [1] and AS 47.10.230(e). The superior court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.