Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 47.32.160 (2026)
Immunity
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 47.32.160. Immunity.
(a) The Department of Health and the Department of Family and Community Services and the employees and agents of both departments are not liable for civil damages as a result of an act or omission in the licensure process, the monitoring of a licensed entity, or any activities under this chapter.
(b) A volunteer who works for a hospice program licensed under this chapter is not liable for damages for personal injury, wrongful death, or property damage for an act or omission committed in the course of hospice-related duties unless the act or omission constitutes gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct.
(a) The Department of Health and the Department of Family and Community Services and the employees and agents of both departments are not liable for civil damages as a result of an act or omission in the licensure process, the monitoring of a licensed entity, or any activities under this chapter.
(b) A volunteer who works for a hospice program licensed under this chapter is not liable for damages for personal injury, wrongful death, or property damage for an act or omission committed in the course of hospice-related duties unless the act or omission constitutes gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Hill v. Giani, 296 P.3d 14 (Alaska 2013).
Hill v. Giani, 296 P.3d 14 (Alaska 2013). “The superior court granted summary judgment: to DHSS and Collier on Hill’s state law tort claims on the basis of immunity under AS 47.32.160(a); to Collier on Hill’s 42 U.”
Alaska Stat. § 47.32.160(a): 1 case
Hill v. Giani, 296 P.3d 14 (Alaska 2013). “The superior court granted summary judgment: to DHSS and Collier on Hill’s state law tort claims on the basis of immunity under AS 47.32.160(a); to Collier on Hill’s 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.