Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-223 (2026)

Misconduct by supervisor; penalty

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A supervisor who neglects or refuses to perform any duty imposed on him without just cause, or who wilfully violates any law provided for or relating to the office of supervisor, or fraudulently or corruptly performs any duty imposed upon him by law, or wilfully, fraudulently or corruptly attempts to perform an act as supervisor unauthorized by law, in addition to other penalties or punishment prescribed, shall forfeit to the county five hundred dollars for every such act, which may be recovered on his official bond, and is further liable on his official bond to any person injured thereby for all damages sustained.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1969–1984 · leading case: Laos v. Arnold, 685 P.2d 115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Laos v. Arnold, 685 P.2d 115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “, A.R.S. § 11-223 (misconduct by county supervisor penalized by forfeiture of $500).”

Cnty. of Cochise v. Good, 453 P.2d 544 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 11× “” The trial judge dismissed the suit on motion of the defendants on the ground that the county attorney had no statutory authority to initiate an action in the name of the county without prior permission from the Board of Supervisors and that therefore it was unnecessary to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.