Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-404 (2026)

Residence of county officers

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following officers shall reside within the county:

1. Judge of the superior court.

2. Treasurer and ex officio tax collector.

3. Clerk of the board of supervisors.

4. Sheriff.

5. Assessor.

6. County attorney.

7. Recorder.

8. School superintendent.

9. Public defender.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Hounshell v. White, 202 P.3d 466 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hounshell v. White, 202 P.3d 466 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). “The legal power to grant or withhold *3 consent and to set salaries does not give the County Board of Supervisors or its agent, the County Manager, the ability to act as an appointing authority for those County Officers enumerated in ARS 11-404[sic]. ¶ 7 The trial court entered…”
Nina Alley v. Cnty. of Pima, No. 4:15-cv-00152 (D. Ariz. Jan. 19, 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 25 11-401(a)(5); and is required to live in Pima County, A.R.S. § 11-404(6). The budget of 26 the Pima County Attorney is set by the Pima County Board of Supervisors.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-404(6): 1 case
Nina Alley v. Cnty. of Pima, No. 4:15-cv-00152 (D. Ariz. Jan. 19, 2024). “§ 25 11-401(a)(5); and is required to live in Pima County, A.R.S. § 11-404(6). The budget of 26 the Pima County Attorney is set by the Pima County Board of Supervisors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.