Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-224 (2026)

Salary; fees for transcripts; free transcripts; office supplies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The salary of the court reporter shall be fixed by the presiding judge of the court, with the approval of the board of supervisors of the county, and shall be paid by the county.

B. The reporter shall receive from a party ordering an appeal transcript, two dollars fifty cents per page for the original, and thirty cents per page for each copy if ordered at the same time and by the same party.

C. The reporter, when requested in advance, shall furnish free of charge to the county attorney or the attorney general a copy of the transcript of testimony when a transcript is made on an appeal in a criminal case, and to the attorney general when the state is a party.

D. The reporter, when requested, shall furnish at county expense to the county attorney or the attorney general a copy of the transcript of testimony of any proceeding held in the superior court when the state or an instrumentality thereof is ordered to provide such transcripts by a federal court in a habeas corpus proceeding in the federal courts or when ordered by the Arizona supreme court to provide such transcripts in a habeas corpus proceeding in state court.

E. The necessary supplies for conduct of the office of reporter shall be furnished by the county.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1965–1996 · leading case: M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996). “, Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §12-224 (B) (1992) ($2.”
Mlb v. Slj, 519 U.S. 102 (1996). “, Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 12-224 (B) (1992) ($2.”
Milburn v. Burns, 400 P.2d 354 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2× “§ 12-224 A. The salary of the court reporter shall be fixed by the judge of the court, with the approval of the board of supervisors of tbe county, and shall be paid by the county.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.