12-3001. Definitions
In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
1. "Arbitration organization" means an association, agency, board, commission or other entity that is neutral and that initiates, sponsors or administers an arbitration proceeding or is involved in the appointment of an arbitrator.
2. "Arbitrator" means an individual who is appointed to render an award, alone or with others, in a controversy that is subject to an agreement to arbitrate.
3. "Court" means a court of competent jurisdiction in this state.
4. "Knowledge" means actual knowledge.
5. "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government or governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality or public corporation or any other legal or commercial entity.
6. "Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and that is retrievable in perceivable form.
Notes of Decisions
Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC, 380 P.3d 659 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “§§ 12-1501 to -1708] or 21 [Revised *431 Uniform Arbitration Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 to -3029] of this title.”
RS Indus., Inc. v. Candrian, 377 P.3d 329 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “Indeed, under Arizona’s version of the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 et seq., as relevant to this appeal, an aggrieved party may petition the superior court to vacate an arbitration award only if the “arbitrator exceeded the arbitrator’s powers.”
J Hamblen Et Ux v. Hon. hatch/winslow Mem'l, 398 P.3d 99 (Ariz. 2017).
· cites it 2× “He argued that the arbitration award disposed of all claims between the parties— including LCMC’s counterclaims—and that the court overstepped its authority under the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (“RUAA”), A.R.S. § 12-3001 to -3029, by ruling that LCMC could reassert its…”
Helen Yu-Wen Chang v. Siu, 323 P.3d 725 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 6× “The parties stipulate, AND IT IS SO ORDERED, that [the Arbitrator] is authorized to proceed as an Arbitrator, to hold hearings and issue binding Arbitration Award(s) orders on all issues raised in the parties’ dissolution action and heard by him____ [The Arbitrator] is…”
Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 336 P.3d 763 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “The agreements are therefore governed by the Arizona Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, AR.S. §§ 12-3001 et seq. See AR.S. § 12-3003(A)(1).”
Escareno Ex Rel. Est. of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C., 366 P.3d 1016 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “Although our legislature has adopted the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, see A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 through 12-3029, we cite to the statutes governing arbitration agreements at the time of the contract formation in this case, see § 12-3003(A)(1).”
State v. Zarco (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “§§ 12-1501 to -1708] or 21 [Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 to -3029] of this title.”
Richert v. Buck (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “As previously noted, the trial court ruled the arbitration would be conducted in accordance with the Arizona Arbitration Act. 9 RICHERT v. BUCK Decision of the Court (“Arbitration awards are entitled to finality in all but narrowly defined circumstances such as fraud,…”
Jordan v. Hubbard (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “¶16 Under Arizona law, A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 to -3029 (2017), judicial review of an arbitrator's award is substantially limited.”
Shield v. Lionheart (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “Conversely, the AZ-RUAA, A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 through -3029, does not apply to employment contracts.”
Singh Roofing v. Shadowood (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 12-3001 to -3029. Both parties acknowledge AZ-RUAA governs the case before us.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-3001(2) — 1 case
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-3001(6) — 1 case
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-3001(B)(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.