In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, "intensive probation":
1. Means a program established pursuant to this chapter of highly structured and closely supervised probation that emphasizes individualized intervention for a person who is deemed appropriate for the program pursuant to section 13-914, subsection B.
2. Includes the payment of restitution, if applicable, as required pursuant to section 13-914, subsection F, paragraph 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1999–2009 · leading case:
State v. Thomas, 996 P.2d 113 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
State v. Thomas, 996 P.2d 113 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 2× “§ 13-3408(A)(1), (B)(1). The state suggests that § 13-901.01 is ambiguous because it conflicts with § 13-917(B).”
State v. Botkin, 209 P.3d 137 (Ariz. 2009).
· cites it 2× “2008); see A.R.S. § 13-913 (2001) (defining “intensive probation” as “a program .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.