Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10201 (2026)

Role of court in administration of trust

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

14-10201. Role of court in administration of trust

A. The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as provided by law.

B. A trust is not subject to continuing judicial supervision unless ordered by the court.

C. A judicial proceeding involving a trust may relate to any matter involving the trust's administration, including a request for instructions and an action to declare rights.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: Weinstein v. Weinstein, 326 P.3d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weinstein v. Weinstein, 326 P.3d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 5× “” AR.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Malhotra v. Malhotra, 377 P.3d 376 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “See A.R.S. §§ 14-10201 (court may intervene in administration of trust in any matter including a request for instructions or action to declare rights); 14-11001 (remedies for breach of trust); 14-11002 to 11003 (setting forth damages).”
May v. May (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 13× “¶22 Shannon argues that Subsection C of A.R.S. § 14-10201 supports her position that the validity of a trust is a matter of trust “administration.”
Jp Morgan v. Adams (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 3× “See A.R.S. § 14-10201(A) (“The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person .”
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Bates v. Bates (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “§ 14-10406; accord A.R.S. § 14-10201(A) (“The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as provided by law.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10201(A) — 6 cases
Weinstein v. Weinstein, 326 P.3d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “” AR.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Malhotra v. Malhotra, 377 P.3d 376 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “See A.R.S. §§ 14-10201 (court may intervene in administration of trust in any matter including a request for instructions or action to declare rights); 14-11001 (remedies for breach of trust); 14-11002 to 11003 (setting forth damages).”
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “” A.R.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Jp Morgan v. Adams (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). “See A.R.S. § 14-10201(A) (“The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person .”
Bates v. Bates (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 14-10406; accord A.R.S. § 14-10201(A) (“The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as provided by law.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10201(C) — 2 cases
May v. May (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). “¶22 Shannon argues that Subsection C of A.R.S. § 14-10201 supports her position that the validity of a trust is a matter of trust “administration.”
Jp Morgan v. Adams (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). “See A.R.S. § 14-10201(A) (“The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.