Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10201 (2026)

Role of court in administration of trust

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

14-10201. Role of court in administration of trust

A. The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as provided by law.

B. A trust is not subject to continuing judicial supervision unless ordered by the court.

C. A judicial proceeding involving a trust may relate to any matter involving the trust's administration, including a request for instructions and an action to declare rights.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: Weinstein v. Weinstein, 326 P.3d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weinstein v. Weinstein, 326 P.3d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 5× “” AR.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Malhotra v. Malhotra, 377 P.3d 376 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “See A.R.S. §§ 14-10201 (court may intervene in administration of trust in any matter including a request for instructions or action to declare rights); 14-11001 (remedies for breach of trust); 14-11002 to 11003 (setting forth damages).”
May v. May, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0392 PB (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2026). · cites it 13× “include[s] . . . an action to declare rights,” Shannon reasons, the term “trust administration” necessarily includes challenges to the validity of trust documents.”
Jp Morgan v. Adams, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0712 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2021). · cites it 3× “”); § 14-10201(C) (“A judicial proceeding involving a trust may relate to any matter involving the trust’s administration, including a request for instructions and an action to declare rights.”
In re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964, No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0117 (Ariz. Ct. App. May 16, 2014). · cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Bates v. Bates, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0845 (Ariz. Ct. App. May 11, 2021). · cites it 2× “508, 509, ¶ 7 (2017). “[T]he best and most reliable index of a statute’s meaning is its language and, when the language is clear and unequivocal, it is determinative of the statute’s construction.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10201(A): 6 cases
Weinstein v. Weinstein, 326 P.3d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “” AR.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Malhotra v. Malhotra, 377 P.3d 376 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “See A.R.S. §§ 14-10201 (court may intervene in administration of trust in any matter including a request for instructions or action to declare rights); 14-11001 (remedies for breach of trust); 14-11002 to 11003 (setting forth damages).”
In re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964, No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0117 (Ariz. Ct. App. May 16, 2014). “” A.R.S. § 14-10201(A). An “interested person” in Title 14 proceedings is defined, as relevant here, as any “beneficiary .”
Jp Morgan v. Adams, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0712 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2021). “”); § 14-10201(C) (“A judicial proceeding involving a trust may relate to any matter involving the trust’s administration, including a request for instructions and an action to declare rights.”
Bates v. Bates, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0845 (Ariz. Ct. App. May 11, 2021). “508, 509, ¶ 7 (2017). “[T]he best and most reliable index of a statute’s meaning is its language and, when the language is clear and unequivocal, it is determinative of the statute’s construction.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10201(C): 2 cases
May v. May, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0392 PB (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2026). “include[s] . . . an action to declare rights,” Shannon reasons, the term “trust administration” necessarily includes challenges to the validity of trust documents.”
Jp Morgan v. Adams, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0712 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2021). “”); § 14-10201(C) (“A judicial proceeding involving a trust may relate to any matter involving the trust’s administration, including a request for instructions and an action to declare rights.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.