Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 21
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-131 (2026)

Jury commissioner

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The jury commissioner shall report to the presiding judge.

B. The presiding judge of the superior court shall set the salary of a jury commissioner who has been appointed by the presiding judge, subject to approval of the county board of supervisors.

C. The jury commissioner or jury manager may administer an oath or affirmation in relation to the examination of any matter contained in this title.

D. The jury commissioner may provide services to any court in the county if requested by that court.

E. The jury commissioner may appoint a designee to perform any act required of the jury commissioner pursuant to this title.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1972–1995 · leading case: State v. Murray, 906 P.2d 542 (Ariz. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Murray, 906 P.2d 542 (Ariz. 1995). · cites it 2× “Several days before the trial was to start and after hearing testimony from the court clerk who serves as jury commissioner, A.R.S. § 21-131(A) (Supp.1994), the trial court ordered that a new jury list be created using both lists.”
State v. Fendler, 622 P.2d 23 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 21-131, See United States v. Flynn, 216 F.”
State ex rel. Williams v. Superior Court, 500 P.2d 352 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). “§ 21-131 provides that the clerk of the superior court shall be the jury commissioner except that in a county having a population of more than 100,000 persons the presiding judge of the superior court may appoint a jury commissioner.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-131(A): 1 case
State v. Murray, 906 P.2d 542 (Ariz. 1995). “Several days before the trial was to start and after hearing testimony from the court clerk who serves as jury commissioner, A.R.S. § 21-131(A) (Supp.1994), the trial court ordered that a new jury list be created using both lists.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.