Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1392 (2026)

Violation; classification

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person who knowingly resists, prevents, impedes or interferes with any member of the board or any of its agents or agencies in the performance of duties pursuant to this article or who violates any provision of this article is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. This section does not apply to any activities carried on outside this state.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1991 · leading case: United Farm Workers Nat'l Union v. Babbitt, 449 F. Supp. 449 (D. Ariz. 1978).
United Farm Workers Nat'l Union v. Babbitt, 449 F. Supp. 449 (D. Ariz. 1978). · cites it 10× “§§ 23-1385(B)(13), 23-1393(B) [restriction and prohibition against striking and picketing]; and finally, (9) A.R.S. § 23-1392 [criminal penalties for violation of the Act].”
Bruce Church, Inc. v. United Farm Workers of Am., 816 P.2d 919 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 7× “Bruce Church counters that this reference to “the police power” of the state means only that conduct must originate in this state in order to be subject to criminal prosecution pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1392, 1 or to be subject to an administrative remedy imposed by the Arizona…”
Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat'l Union, 442 U.S. 289 (1979). · cites it 2× “On the basis of past instances of enforcement of the Act and in light of the provision for imposition of criminal penalties for "violat[ion of] any provision" of the Act, Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23-1392 (Supp. 1978), the court determined that appellees' challenges were presently…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.