Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 28
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-444 (2026)

Computer storage; evidence

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The director may cause the information contained on an original or duplicate made pursuant to this article to be placed on computer storage devices, but the original or the duplicate shall be maintained by the department for as long as required by law or the director deems necessary after which time the records may be disposed of as provided in this article. Signatures on records need not be placed on the computer storage devices.

B. A duplicate of the information placed on computer storage devices is admissible in evidence without further foundation in all courts or administrative agencies if the following certification appears on each page:

This document is a certified duplicate of the information contained in the computer storage devices of the department of transportation, motor vehicle division, in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes section 28-444.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1969–1997 · leading case: Application of Hathcock, 450 P.2d 419 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Application of Hathcock, 450 P.2d 419 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 6× “In the case at bar, there is no question but what there was filed with the Superintendent a proper certificate of conviction of the second offense, driving-under-the-influence charge, as required of the justice of the peace of the Camp Verde Precinct, Yavapai County, by A.R.S. §…”
State v. Morales, 630 P.2d 1015 (Ariz. 1981). · cites it 2× “The disposition of a child in the juvenile court may not be used against the child in any case or proceeding in any court other than a juvenile court, whether before or after reaching majority, except in dispositional proceedings after conviction of a felony for the purposes of…”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty. Juv. Action Nos. JV-512600 & JV-512797, 930 P.2d 496 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “Section 8-207(0 provides: The disposition of a child in the juvenile court may not be used against the child in any case or proceeding in any court other than a juvenile court, whether before or after reaching majority, except as provided by § 28-444. The use of a juvenile’s DNA…”
Taylor v. Sherrill, 802 P.2d 1058 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 28-444(D). If a person fails to appear on a traffic complaint, “.”
Campbell v. Superior Court, Cnty. of Maricopa, 462 P.2d 801 (Ariz. 1969). · cites it 3× “B dealing with license revocations and § 28-445 must be read together and that the terms of § 28-444 with reference to the meaning of the word “conviction” applies with equal weight to the revocation provision of § 28-692.”
State v. Corona, 932 P.2d 1356 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). “The disposition of a child in the juvenile court may not be used against the child in any case or proceeding in any court other than a juvenile court, whether before or after reaching majority, except as provided by § 28-444.”
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-508801, 901 P.2d 1205 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “A juvenile delinquent is not such a person.”
State v. Levitt, 747 P.2d 607 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “) The reference to § 28-444 pertains to the reporting of traffic violations for purposes of license suspension and revocation by the Department of Transportation.”
Thomson v. Miller ex rel. Arizona High. Dep't, 788 P.2d 1212 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 28-444 defines conviction to include a delinquency adjudication for drunk driving.”
Campbell v. Malik, 454 P.2d 1002 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “) A.R.S. § 28-444 defines the word “conviction” to mean a final conviction.”
Carlson v. Arizona Dep't of Transp., 703 P.2d 544 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “Later, after receiving the record from the court of the 1983 conviction as required by A.R.S. § 28-444 and before the expiration of the 90-day suspension, appellant revoked the appellee’s driver's license for one year pursuant to A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-444(C) — 1 case
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty., No. Jv-508801, 901 P.2d 1205 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). “A juvenile delinquent is not such a person.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-444(D) — 1 case
Taylor v. Sherrill, 802 P.2d 1058 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). “See A.R.S. § 28-444(D). If a person fails to appear on a traffic complaint, “.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.