A. Except as otherwise provided in subsections B and C, the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership.
B. An association formed under a statute other than this chapter, a predecessor statute or a comparable statute of another jurisdiction is not a partnership under this chapter.
C. In determining whether a partnership is formed, the following rules apply:
1. Joint tenancy, tenancy in common, tenancy by the entireties, joint property, common property or part ownership does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the co-owners share profits made by the use of the property, except that the ownership establishes a partnership if the persons have declared in a written partnership agreement that the property is partnership property subject to the provisions of the partnership agreement and this chapter.
2. The sharing of gross returns does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the persons sharing them have a joint or common right or interest in property from which the returns are derived.
3. A person who receives a share of the profits of a business is presumed to be a partner in the business, unless the profits were received in payment either:
(a) Of a debt by installments or otherwise.
(b) For services as an independent contractor or of wages or other compensation to an employee.
(c) Of rent.
(d) Of an annuity or any other retirement benefit to a beneficiary, representative or designee of a deceased or retired partner.
(e) Of interest or other charge on a loan, even if the amount of payment varies with the profits of the business, including a direct or indirect present or future ownership of the collateral, or rights to income, proceeds or increase in value derived from the collateral.
(f) For the sale of the goodwill of any business or other property by installments or otherwise.
Notes of Decisions
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard, 334 P.3d 734 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 11× “¶ 19 Subsections (A) and (B) of A.R.S. § 29-1012 provide: A. Except as otherwise provided in subsections B and C, the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership.”
Turley v. Ethington, 146 P.3d 1282 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” § 29-1012. The RUPA does not require partnership agreements, even those governing partnerships dealing in real property, to be in writing.”
Mann v. GTCR Golder Rauner, L.L.C., 425 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (D. Ariz. 2006).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 29-1012(A). Plaintiffs also cite numerous sections from the individual Plaintiffs’ depositions where they spoke about certain aspects of the joint venture, indicating that they did know of its existence.”
Est. of Lockett v. Comm'r, 2012 T.C. Memo. 123 (Tax Ct. 2012).
“29-1012(A) (1998) provides that "the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership.”
Altherr v. Altherr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 10× “See A.R.S. § 29-1012; see also Myrland v. Myrland, 19 Ariz.”
Rindlisbacher v. Steinway & Sons Inc. (D. Ariz. 2020).
· cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 29-1012(A). There is no 28 evidence that the Rindlisbachers and Steinway were co-owners of Piano Showroom of - 31 - Case 2:18-cv-01131-MTL Document 252 Filed 10/30/20 Page 32 of 47 1 Arizona.”
Blansette v. Cruger (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× “§ 29- 1012(A); see also A.R.S. § 29-1012(C)(1) (noting that part ownership in a property "does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the co-owners share profits made by the use of the property"); Cook v.”
McMillan v. Garland (D. Ariz. 2022).
· cites it 2× “In the RUPA, a “partnership” is 8 defined as “an association or entity formed under § 29-1012, a predecessor law or a 9 comparable law of another jurisdiction.”
Reyes v. Mendez (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 3× “However, § 29-1012(C)(1) provides that co-tenancy “does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the co-owners share profits made by the property.”
Turley v. Ethington (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” § 29-1012. The RUPA does not require partnership agreements, even those governing partnerships dealing in real property, to be in writing.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-1012(A) — 5 cases
Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard, 334 P.3d 734 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
“¶ 19 Subsections (A) and (B) of A.R.S. § 29-1012 provide: A. Except as otherwise provided in subsections B and C, the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership.”
Mann v. GTCR Golder Rauner, L.L.C., 425 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (D. Ariz. 2006).
“A.R.S. § 29-1012(A). Plaintiffs also cite numerous sections from the individual Plaintiffs’ depositions where they spoke about certain aspects of the joint venture, indicating that they did know of its existence.”
Altherr v. Altherr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“See A.R.S. § 29-1012; see also Myrland v. Myrland, 19 Ariz.”
Rindlisbacher v. Steinway & Sons Inc. (D. Ariz. 2020).
“” A.R.S. § 29-1012(A). There is no 28 evidence that the Rindlisbachers and Steinway were co-owners of Piano Showroom of - 31 - Case 2:18-cv-01131-MTL Document 252 Filed 10/30/20 Page 32 of 47 1 Arizona.”
Reyes v. Mendez (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
“However, § 29-1012(C)(1) provides that co-tenancy “does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the co-owners share profits made by the property.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-1012(C)(1) — 3 cases
Altherr v. Altherr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“See A.R.S. § 29-1012; see also Myrland v. Myrland, 19 Ariz.”
Blansette v. Cruger (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“§ 29- 1012(A); see also A.R.S. § 29-1012(C)(1) (noting that part ownership in a property "does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the co-owners share profits made by the use of the property"); Cook v.”
Reyes v. Mendez (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
“However, § 29-1012(C)(1) provides that co-tenancy “does not by itself establish a partnership, even if the co-owners share profits made by the property.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-1012(C)(3) — 2 cases
Altherr v. Altherr (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
“See A.R.S. § 29-1012; see also Myrland v. Myrland, 19 Ariz.”
Rindlisbacher v. Steinway & Sons Inc. (D. Ariz. 2020).
“” A.R.S. § 29-1012(A). There is no 28 evidence that the Rindlisbachers and Steinway were co-owners of Piano Showroom of - 31 - Case 2:18-cv-01131-MTL Document 252 Filed 10/30/20 Page 32 of 47 1 Arizona.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.