Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-3115 (2026)

Statutory agent

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

29-3115. Statutory agent

A. Each limited liability company and each registered foreign limited liability company shall designate and maintain a statutory agent in this state.  Unless the statutory agent signed the document making the appointment, the appointment of a statutory agent is not effective until the agent or the company delivers a record to the commission signed by the agent accepting the appointment.

B. A statutory agent for a limited liability company or registered foreign limited liability company must have a place of business or residence in this state.  A statutory agent must be either an individual resident of this state, a domestic corporation, a limited liability company, a foreign corporation or a foreign limited liability company authorized to transact business in this state.

C. The only duties under this chapter of a statutory agent that has complied with this chapter are:

1. To forward to the limited liability company or registered foreign limited liability company at the address most recently supplied to the agent by the company or foreign company any process, notice or demand pertaining to the company or foreign company that is served on or received by the agent.

2. If the statutory agent resigns, to provide the notice required by section 29-3117, subsection C to the company or foreign company at the address most recently supplied to the agent by the company or foreign company.

3. To keep current the information with respect to the agent in the articles of organization or foreign registration statement.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2023 · leading case: Olewin v. Nobel, 523 P.3d 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Olewin v. Nobel, 523 P.3d 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “¶14 Nobel argues service by mail was insufficient, relying on Rule 5(c)(4), titled “Service After Judgment:” After the time for appeal from a judgment has expired or a judgment has become final after appeal, a motion, petition, complaint, or other pleading requesting…”
Vistancia Dev. LLC v. Preston, No. 2:21-cv-01707 (D. Ariz. June 15, 2022). · cites it 2× “” 5 A.R.S. § 29-3115(C)(1). 6 Here, Alpha Legal was served as the statutory agent of DBD, and DBD—as the 7 principal—had constructive notice of the Complaint.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-3115(C)(1): 2 cases
Olewin v. Nobel, 523 P.3d 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023). “¶14 Nobel argues service by mail was insufficient, relying on Rule 5(c)(4), titled “Service After Judgment:” After the time for appeal from a judgment has expired or a judgment has become final after appeal, a motion, petition, complaint, or other pleading requesting…”
Vistancia Dev. LLC v. Preston, No. 2:21-cv-01707 (D. Ariz. June 15, 2022). “” 5 A.R.S. § 29-3115(C)(1). 6 Here, Alpha Legal was served as the statutory agent of DBD, and DBD—as the 7 principal—had constructive notice of the Complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.