Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 3-401 (2026)

Definitions

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Affected commodity" means the specific citrus, fruit or vegetable that is regulated pursuant to article 2 or 4 of this chapter and that is subject to the marketing agreement or order or the proposed marketing agreement or order.

2. "Affected person" means a producer or shipper of an affected commodity.

3. "Associate director" means the associate director of the citrus, fruit and vegetable division of the department.

4. "Marketing agreement" or "agreement" means an agreement that is developed by producers or shippers of the affected commodity and that is entered into by the director pursuant to this article.

5. "Marketing commission" or "commission" means the marketing commission established under section 3-413.

6. "Marketing committee" or "committee" means a marketing committee established by a marketing agreement according to section 3-426.

7. "Marketing order" or "order" means an order that is developed by producers or shippers of the affected commodity and that is issued by the director pursuant to this article.

8. "Person" means any individual, firm, corporation, trust, association or partnership.

9. "Producer" means a person that has a financial interest in producing or causing citrus, fruit or vegetable commodities to be produced for market in commercial quantities.

10. "Shipper" means a person that engages in shipping, transporting, selling or marketing citrus, fruits or vegetables under the shipper's own registered trademark or label or a person that first markets the fruits or vegetables for the producer.

11. "Volume" means cartons or the equivalent weight of Arizona-grown products marketed in the preceding marketing season.

12. "Written assent" means a signed statement of an affected person consenting to the terms of a marketing order.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–1991 · leading case: Anthony A. Bianco, Inc. v. Hess, 339 P.2d 1038 (Ariz. 1959).
Anthony A. Bianco, Inc. v. Hess, 339 P.2d 1038 (Ariz. 1959). · cites it 10× “Tyler, Lyle Patrick, Lawrence Mehren and Walter White, against the Agricultural Prorate Commission of the State of Arizona, and the Supervisor of Inspection of the State of Arizona, seeking a declaratory judgment interpreting certain parts of the Agricultural Prorate Act of 1939…”
Matter of Est. of Ivester, 812 P.2d 1141 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). “) § 3-401, comment (1983). The essence of Emily’s application was a request for formal adjudication of intestacy, notwithstanding the caption, and it contained the statements required by A.”
Graham v. Shaffer, 498 P.2d 571 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). “urt and after testimony was presented by both sides *499 the court entered its order which included the following: “It is the finding's of the court that the minor child of the plaintiff has been deprived of parental support or care by reason of the continued absence of the home…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.