Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 30-810 (2026)

Buy-through program; terms, conditions, limitations; definition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

30-810. Buy-through program; terms, conditions, limitations; definition

A. On or before January 1, 2024, a public power entity that is an agricultural improvement district established pursuant to title 48, chapter 17 shall offer a buy-through program that both:

1. Includes terms, conditions and limitations, including a minimum qualifying load and a maximum amount of program participation.

2. Is structured to maintain system reliability and to avoid a cost shift to nonparticipating customers.

B. For the purposes of this section, "buy-through" means a purchase of electricity by a public power entity at the direction of a particular retail consumer, subject to the terms of the program.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1969–2020 · leading case: Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. (D. Ariz. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. (D. Ariz. 2020). · cites it 15× “) 19 Relatedly, it claims A.R.S. §§ 30-810 – 812 effectively codifies the filed-rate doctrine in 20 Arizona and alternatively bars Plaintiffs’ state-law claims.”
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the Cnty. of Cochise, 457 P.2d 348 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). “We hold that the amount recovered by the personal representative of a deceased, under the provisions of section 30-810, Comp.St.1929, as amended by chapter 92, Laws 1919, shall be paid to and distributed among such of the widow, widower and next of kin of such deceased as suffer…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 30-810(A) — 1 case
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. (D. Ariz. 2020). “) 19 Relatedly, it claims A.R.S. §§ 30-810 – 812 effectively codifies the filed-rate doctrine in 20 Arizona and alternatively bars Plaintiffs’ state-law claims.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 30-810(B) — 1 case
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. (D. Ariz. 2020). “) 19 Relatedly, it claims A.R.S. §§ 30-810 – 812 effectively codifies the filed-rate doctrine in 20 Arizona and alternatively bars Plaintiffs’ state-law claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.