Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 30-810 (2026)

Buy-through program; terms, conditions, limitations; definition

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

30-810. Buy-through program; terms, conditions, limitations; definition

A. On or before January 1, 2024, a public power entity that is an agricultural improvement district established pursuant to title 48, chapter 17 shall offer a buy-through program that both:

1. Includes terms, conditions and limitations, including a minimum qualifying load and a maximum amount of program participation.

2. Is structured to maintain system reliability and to avoid a cost shift to nonparticipating customers.

B. For the purposes of this section, "buy-through" means a purchase of electricity by a public power entity at the direction of a particular retail consumer, subject to the terms of the program.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1969–2020 · leading case: Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the Cnty. of Cochise, 457 P.2d 348 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lueck v. Superior Court in & for the Cnty. of Cochise, 457 P.2d 348 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). “We hold that the amount recovered by the personal representative of a deceased, under the provisions of section 30-810, Comp.St.1929, as amended by chapter 92, Laws 1919, shall be paid to and distributed among such of the widow, widower and next of kin of such deceased as suffer…”
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist., 432 F. Supp. 3d 1070 (D. Ariz. 2020). · cites it 15× “) 19 Relatedly, it claims A.R.S. §§ 30-810 – 812 effectively codifies the filed-rate doctrine in 20 Arizona and alternatively bars Plaintiffs’ state-law claims.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 30-810(A): 1 case
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist., 432 F. Supp. 3d 1070 (D. Ariz. 2020). “) 19 Relatedly, it claims A.R.S. §§ 30-810 – 812 effectively codifies the filed-rate doctrine in 20 Arizona and alternatively bars Plaintiffs’ state-law claims.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 30-810(B): 1 case
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist., 432 F. Supp. 3d 1070 (D. Ariz. 2020). “) 19 Relatedly, it claims A.R.S. §§ 30-810 – 812 effectively codifies the filed-rate doctrine in 20 Arizona and alternatively bars Plaintiffs’ state-law claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.