Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-2154 (2026)

Cease and desist orders; hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. If it appears to the commissioner that any person has engaged, is engaging or is preparing to engage in any act, practice or transaction that constitutes a violation of this chapter or any rule adopted or order issued by the commissioner, the commissioner may issue an order directing any person to cease and desist from engaging in the act, practice or transaction or doing any act in furtherance of the act, practice or transaction, to make restitution or to take appropriate affirmative action, within a reasonable period of time as prescribed by the commissioner, to correct the conditions resulting from the act, practice or transaction.

B. A person aggrieved by a cease and desist order issued by the commissioner pursuant to this section may request a hearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10 and the commissioner may issue the order or orders as the commissioner deems necessary to protect the public interest.  The commissioner may also bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the person to enjoin the person from continuing in violation of this chapter.  These proceedings shall be promptly instituted and determined.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1961–1972 · leading case: Farragut Baggage & Transfer Co. v. Shadron Realty Inc., 501 P.2d 38 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Farragut Baggage & Transfer Co. v. Shadron Realty Inc., 501 P.2d 38 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1972). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 32-2154. A.R.S. § 32-2155 imposes criminal sanctions on a broker who does not employ legally licensed salesmen.”
Sulger v. Maslin, 365 P.2d 1113 (Ariz. 1961). “Section 32-2154. An examination of this section discloses that it provides for criminal prosecution of those acting as real estate brokers without a license, and this case is not one of a criminal nature.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.