Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 33
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-1201 (2026)

Applicability

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter applies to all condominiums created within this state without regard to the date the condominium was created.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Villas at Hidden Lakes Condos. Ass'n v. Geupel Constr. Co., 847 P.2d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Villas at Hidden Lakes Condos. Ass'n v. Geupel Constr. Co., 847 P.2d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 33-1201(A) (establishing effective date of UCA).”
Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condos. Homeowners Ass'n, 941 P.2d 218 (Ariz. 1997). · cites it 2× “Arizona statutes define condominiums and condominium associations under A.R.S. § 33-1201 et seq.: “Condominium” means real estate, portions of which are designated for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the owners of the…”
Beeter v. Tri-City Prop. Mgmt. Servs., Inc. (In Re Beeter), 173 B.R. 108 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1994). · cites it 2× “Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 33-1201 to 33-1270 (West Supp.”
Mountain View Condos. Homeowners Ass'n v. Scott, 883 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 5× “The Arizona Uniform Condominium Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1201 to 1270, added by Laws 1985, Ch.”
Mountain View Condo. Ass'n v. Scott, 883 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 5× “[5] The Arizona Uniform Condominium Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1201 to 1270, added by Laws 1985, Ch.”
1 Ca-Cv 21-0275 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “¶9 The Xias sued PFP Dorsey and the Association, seeking a declaratory judgment that the transaction violated the Arizona Condominium Act, A.R.S. § 33-1201, et seq., which governs condominium termination.”
Cao v. Pfp Dorsey (Ariz. 2024). · cites it 3× “” The Declaration defined the Condominium Act as “A.R.S. § 33-1201, et seq., as amended from time to time.”
Shaffer v. Procaccianti (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “10 Appellants additionally argue that the HOA failed to comply with A.R.S. § 33-1201 (2014) et seq. in incorporating as a non-profit and replacing the pre-1994, unincorporated HOA.”
Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas (Ariz. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 33-1201, -1241. ¶3 In March 2021, Whitmer sued the Association, requesting a contempt finding and injunctive relief because the Association allegedly failed to (1) comply with a 2015 administrative order addressing statutory budgeting requirements, (2) adopt a…”
Whitmer v. Hilton Casitas (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 33-1201 to -1270. ¶3 In 2014, Whitmer filed a petition with the predecessor agency to the Arizona Department of Real Estate (the “Department”) alleging that Hilton Casitas had violated its statutory obligations regarding association budgets.”
Whiter v. hilton/procaccianti (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “Therefore, the Association, although not specifically named in the Declaration, is subject to the Declaration and A.R.S. § 33-1201 et seq. ¶14 Finally, Homeowners point us to LC2022-000424, a superior court ruling reviewing an administrative decision by the Arizona Department of…”
Le v. North Shore (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 North Shore is a planned condominium community in Tempe that is subject to Arizona’s Condominium Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1201 et seq. (the “Act”). The community is subject to the restrictions set forth in a declaration (the “Declaration”) that was…”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-1201(A) — 1 case
Villas at Hidden Lakes Condos. Ass'n v. Geupel Constr. Co., 847 P.2d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “See A.R.S. § 33-1201(A) (establishing effective date of UCA).”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-1201(B) — 4 cases
Villas at Hidden Lakes Condos. Ass'n v. Geupel Constr. Co., 847 P.2d 117 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “See A.R.S. § 33-1201(A) (establishing effective date of UCA).”
Beeter v. Tri-City Prop. Mgmt. Servs., Inc. (In Re Beeter), 173 B.R. 108 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1994). “Ariz. Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 33-1201 to 33-1270 (West Supp.”
Mountain View Condos. Homeowners Ass'n v. Scott, 883 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “The Arizona Uniform Condominium Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1201 to 1270, added by Laws 1985, Ch.”
Mountain View Condo. Ass'n v. Scott, 883 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). “[5] The Arizona Uniform Condominium Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1201 to 1270, added by Laws 1985, Ch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.