Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 33
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-1301 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Arizona residential landlord and tenant act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2023 · leading case: Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar, 622 P.2d 512 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mead, Samuel & Co., Inc. v. Dyar, 622 P.2d 512 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 4× “By enacting § 33-1365A the Legislature changed the law so as to give tenants the right to assert counterclaims in an action by the landlord for possession or for rent “for any amount which he [the tenant] may recover under the rental agreement or this chapter (ALRTA, A.R.S. §…”
Keenen v. Biles, 17 P.3d 111 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. §§ 33-1301 to -1706 (2000). ¶3 The Biles assert that the judgment should be overturned because they returned possession of the property to Keenen prior to the judgment date.”
Kaufman v. Langhofer, 222 P.3d 272 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “¶ 13 In Thomas , we held a tenant who is not provided necessary services and maintenance of leased premises as required under the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1301 to -1381 (2007 & Supp.2009), could recover emotional distress damages even if the…”
Lisa v. Strom, 904 P.2d 1239 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “…today, as an agreement to pay attorney’s fees out of the recovery itself is a genuine financial obligation. 4 . A.R.S. §§ 33-1301 to 33-1381.”
Thomas v. Goudreault, 786 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “DAMAGES FOR MENTAL SUFFERING After instructing the jury on the duties of a landlord under the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, A.R.S. § 33-1301 et seq., (the Act) the trial court, over objection, gave the following instructions: “If you find that the Goudreault…”
Ibarra v. Gastelum, 471 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 33-1301 to -1381. Ibarra presumes that a violation of the Act could serve as the basis for a negligence per se personal injury claim.”
Crawford v. Yotty, 828 N.W.2d 295 (Iowa 2013). “380; Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 33-1301 to -1381; Conn.”
Dushoff v. Phoenix Co., 528 P.2d 637 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “The Legislature also enacted the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 33-1301 et seq., an act which requires that “[i]f the tenant abandons the dwelling unit, the landlord shall make resonable efforts to rent it at a fair rental.”
Tovar v. Superior Court of Arizona, Etc., 647 P.2d 1147 (Ariz. 1982). · cites it 2× “Statutes pertaining to lessees’ rights with respect to residential property are found in A.R.S. §§ 33-1301 to -1381. 3 . A.R.S. § 33-361 has been revised since Makalla , but the revisions are not relevant to the issues presently before us.”
Found. Dev. Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc., 780 P.2d 1074 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Therefore, this decision is only applicable to those matters brought prior to the effective date of the statutory amendment.”
Van Buren Apts. v. Adams, 701 P.2d 583 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Appellants contend that the defense of retaliatory eviction was available to them by virtue of the enactment of the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, A.R.S. § 33-1301 et seq. We agree. In 1973 Arizona adopted a modified version of the Uniform Residential Landlord and…”
U-Stor Bell, L.L.C. v. Maricopa Cnty., 59 P.3d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, A.R.S. §§ 33-1301 through 33-1381 (2000 and Supp.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.