Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-449.02 (2026)

Abortion clinics; licensure requirements; rules; inspections; standing to intervene; legal counsel

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Beginning on April 1, 2000, an abortion clinic shall meet the same licensure requirements as prescribed in article 2 of this chapter for health care institutions. At the time of licensure, an abortion clinic shall submit to the director all documentation required by this article, including verification that the clinic's physicians who are required to be available have admitting privileges at a health care institution as required by section 36-449.03, subsection C, paragraph 3.

B. On or before the anniversary of the issue date of an abortion clinic's license, the abortion clinic shall submit to the director all documentation required by this article.

C. Beginning on April 1, 2000, abortion clinics shall comply with department requirements for abortion clinics and department rules that govern abortion clinics.

D. If the director determines that there is reasonable cause to believe an abortion clinic is not adhering to the licensing requirements of this article or any other law or rule concerning abortion, the director and any duly designated employee or agent of the director, including county health representatives and county or municipal fire inspectors, consistent with standard medical practices, may enter on and into the premises of the abortion clinic that is licensed or required to be licensed pursuant to this article during regular business hours of the abortion clinic to determine compliance with this article, rules adopted pursuant to this article, local fire ordinances or rules and any other law or rule relating to abortion.

E. An application for licensure pursuant to this article constitutes permission for, and complete acquiescence in, an entry or inspection of the premises during the pendency of the application and, if licensed, while the abortion clinic is licensed.

F. If an inspection conducted pursuant to this section reveals that an abortion clinic is not adhering to the licensing requirements prescribed pursuant to this article or any other law or rule concerning abortion, the director may take action authorized by this article.

G. An abortion clinic whose license has been suspended or revoked pursuant to this article or section 36-424 is subject to inspection on application for relicensure or reinstatement of the license.

H. In any proceeding in which the constitutionality, legality or application of this section is challenged, the attorney general or any county or city attorney who wishes to defend the law has the right to intervene as a party and is deemed to have proper standing in the matter.  The only objection that may be raised to a motion to intervene as of right pursuant to this subsection is that the proposed intervenor does not have a good faith intention to defend the law. Any party or proposed intervenor may raise this objection. Notwithstanding section 41-192, the department may employ legal counsel and make an expenditure or incur an indebtedness for legal services for the purposes of defending this section.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. Brnovich, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1075 (D. Ariz. 2016).
Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. Brnovich, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1075 (D. Ariz. 2016). “or any other law or rule concerning abortion,” § 36-449.02(F); to penalize an abortion clinic that “is not in substantial compliance” with the laws governing abortion clinics or the rules, § 36-449.”
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg (Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2× “For example, Title 36’s abortion licensing requirements, A.R.S. § 36-449.02, reporting requirements, A.”
Isaacson v. Mayes (D. Ariz. 2022). · cites it 2× “Code §§ R9-10- 22 1501(1), R9-10-1507(B)(2)–(3) (licensing and credentialing requirements for abortion 23 providers); A.R.S. §§ 36-449.02, 36-449.03 & Ariz. Admin.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-449.02(F) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. Brnovich, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1075 (D. Ariz. 2016). “or any other law or rule concerning abortion,” § 36-449.02(F); to penalize an abortion clinic that “is not in substantial compliance” with the laws governing abortion clinics or the rules, § 36-449.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.