A. If the accused pleads guilty or refuses to answer the accusation, the court shall render judgment of conviction against him. If the accused denies the matters charged, the court shall immediately, or at such time as it appoints, try the accusation.
B. The trial shall be by jury, unless expressly waived by the accused, and conducted in the same manner as the trial of an indictment or information.
C. Upon conviction, the court shall pronounce judgment that the accused be removed from office.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1970–2008 · leading case:
Hounshell v. White, 202 P.3d 466 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
Hounshell v. White, 202 P.3d 466 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 38-343(c). ¶ 25 Second, while we acknowledge the potential for inconsistent disciplinary decisions — i.”
Dep't of Revenue v. S. Union Gas Co., 582 P.2d 158 (Ariz. 1978).
“Proceedings upon such complaints shall be in accordance with the provisions of subsections B and C of § 38-342 and §§ 38-343 and 38-345. ****** 6. Contest any proposed valuation or classification or any proposed change in valuations or classifications before any county board of…”
State v. Burr, 467 P.2d 784 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1970).
· cites it 3× “The Rules of Criminal Procedure also contain reference to the procedure to be followed in A.R.S. § 38-343, op. cit.: “A. Every felony and every misdemeanor of which the superior court has original jurisdiction shall be prosecuted by indictment or information, and every…”
Dep't of Revenue v. S. Union Gas Co., 582 P.2d 182 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977).
“Proceedings upon such complaints shall be in accordance with the provisions of subsections B and C of § 38-342, and §§ 38-343 and 38-345. ****** 6. Contest any proposed valuation or classification or any proposed change in valuations or classifications before any county board of…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-343(c): 1 case
Hounshell v. White, 202 P.3d 466 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
“A.R.S. § 38-343(c). ¶ 25 Second, while we acknowledge the potential for inconsistent disciplinary decisions — i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.