A. A person filing a claim for relief seeking damages from a licensee and alleging that a person was injured or damage occurred which was caused in whole or in part by reason of the furnishing or serving of spirituous liquor by the licensee or an employee of the licensee to any person shall file a copy of the complaint with the department within ten days after filing the complaint.
B. A licensee who has been served with a complaint alleging the provisions of subsection A shall file a copy of the complaint with the department within ten days after the service.
C. A licensee or controlling person who files a petition in bankruptcy shall file notice of the petition with the department within ten days after the filing or entry and shall advise the department within ten days of a dismissal or discharge by any means.
D. A licensee or controlling person who files a bankruptcy dismissal or discharge shall file notice of the dismissal or discharge with the department within ten days after the filing.
Notes of Decisions
Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming Enter., 129 P.3d 78 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “And, § 4-244(14), part of the “Regulations and Prohibitions,” makes it unlawful to serve spirituous liquor to someone who is “obviously intoxicated” — a basis for the civil action provided in § 4-311.”
Bd. of Regents of Univ. & State Colleges v. Frohmiller, 208 P.2d 833 (Ariz. 1949).
· cites it 2× “If it is refiled she -shall again investigate it and if no “public purpose” is manifest she shall “again reject the claim, and report the -fact of such rejection to the governor, and no warrant shall he drawn thereon, unless the governor specifically approves the claim in whole…”
State Ex Rel. Frohmiller v. Hendrix, 124 P.2d 768 (Ariz. 1942).
“These sections are subdivision 6, section 4-302, referring to the auditor; and subdivision 2, section 4-502, and section 4-503, Arizona Code 1939, affecting the attorney general.”
Gary Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming Enter., No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0129 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2006).
· cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 4-302(A). That notice requirement suggests the statutory dram shop action is an integral part of the state’s alcohol regulatory scheme.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 4-302(A): 2 cases
Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming Enter., 129 P.3d 78 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).
“And, § 4-244(14), part of the “Regulations and Prohibitions,” makes it unlawful to serve spirituous liquor to someone who is “obviously intoxicated” — a basis for the civil action provided in § 4-311.”
Gary Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming Enter., No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0129 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2006).
“” A.R.S. § 4-302(A). That notice requirement suggests the statutory dram shop action is an integral part of the state’s alcohol regulatory scheme.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.