Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604 (2026)

Duties and powers of director

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

41-1604. Duties and powers of director

A. The director shall:

1. Be responsible for the overall operations and policies of the department.

2. Maintain and administer all institutions and programs within the department, including prisons, reception and diagnostic centers, conservation camps, community correctional centers and such other facilities and programs as may be required and established for the custody, control, correction, treatment and rehabilitation of all adult offenders who are committed to the department.

3. Be responsible for the administration and execution of all community supervision services, including those for adult offenders who are released in accordance with law.

4. Develop a program to provide uniform statewide community supervision field services in this state and employ parole or community supervision officers based on qualifications prescribed by the director, including physical, psychological and educational qualifications and practical experience.

5. Be responsible for the development of policies and programs that shall be recommended to the governor and the legislature for the purpose of improving the various adult correctional programs of this state.

6. Develop and establish a uniform statewide method of reporting statistics as related to this chapter.

7. Subject to chapter 4, article 4 of this title, employ deputy directors and other key personnel based on qualifications prescribed by the director that require education and practical experience.

8. Adopt rules pursuant to chapter 6 of this title for the development of incentives to encourage good behavior and the faithful performance of work by prisoners.

9. Adopt rules pursuant to chapter 6 of this title to limit inmate access to the internet through the use of a computer, computer system, network, computer service provider or remote computing service.

10. Cooperate with the Arizona-Mexico commission in the governor's office and with researchers at universities in this state to collect data and conduct projects in the United States and Mexico on issues that are within the scope of the department's duties and that relate to quality of life, trade and economic development in this state in a manner that will help the Arizona-Mexico commission to assess and enhance the economic competitiveness of this state and of the Arizona-Mexico region.

B. The director may:

1. Adopt rules to implement the purposes of the department and the duties and powers of the director.

2. Take any administrative action to improve the efficiency of the department, including the following:

(a) Create new divisions or units or consolidate divisions or units.

(b) Subject to chapter 4, article 4 of this title, transfer employees between the various divisions and units of the department.

(d) Delegate to appropriate personnel the administrative functions, powers or duties that the director believes can be competently, efficiently and properly performed. The director shall not delegate the responsibilities in subsection A, paragraphs 1 and 5 of this section.

(e) Transfer adult inmates between adult institutions or adult facilities.

(f) Authorize work crews to perform acceptable tasks in any part of this state.

(g) Accept unconvicted persons pursuant to a court order for the purposes of examination and treatment regarding competency to understand any stage of a criminal proceeding after indictment or information or their ability to assist in their own defense.

(h) Accept convicted yet unsentenced persons pursuant to a court order for the purposes of conducting a mental health examination or a diagnostic evaluation.

(i) Subject to chapter 4, article 4 and, as applicable, article 5 of this title, appoint certain employees of the department to peace officer status for the purposes of guarding, transporting or pursuing persons who are under the jurisdiction of the department and appoint certain employees of the department to peace officer status for the purposes of investigating or arresting persons who commit or attempt to commit offenses directly relating to the operations of the department. Peace officers of the department shall not preempt the authority and jurisdiction of established agencies of this state and political subdivisions of this state. Such officers shall notify agencies of this state and political subdivisions of this state before conducting an investigation within the jurisdiction of the agency and before making an arrest within the jurisdiction of the agency and shall ask, except in an emergency, if the agency wishes to participate, perform the investigation or arrest the person to be arrested before proceeding. Personnel who are appointed as peace officers by the director shall have the minimum qualifications established for peace officers pursuant to section 41-1822. Personnel who are appointed by the director pursuant to this subdivision are not eligible to participate in the public safety personnel retirement system except as otherwise provided in title 38, chapter 5, article 4.

(j) Operate travel reduction programs that are subsidized by the department for employees who commute between work and home by vanpools, carpools and buses or in vehicles that are purchased or leased by the department.

3. Establish by rule a onetime fee for conducting background checks on any person who enters a department facility to visit a prisoner. A fee shall not be charged for a person who is under eighteen years of age. The director may adopt rules that waive all or part of the fee. The director shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35-146 and 35-147, any monies collected pursuant to this paragraph in the department of corrections building renewal fund established by section 41-797.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 31 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1968–2025 · leading case: Zavala v. Arizona State Pers. Bd., 766 P.2d 608 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Zavala v. Arizona State Pers. Bd., 766 P.2d 608 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 8× “A.R.S. § 41-1604 was amended by Laws 1986, Ch.”

Litchfield Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 79 v. Babbitt, 608 P.2d 792 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 4× “(emphasis added) Appellees also cite A.R.S. § 41-1604(A)(2), which reads as follows: A.”

State v. Bryant, 200 P.3d 1011 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See AR.S. § 41-1604(A)(2) (duties of department include having custody of adult offenders).”

Casey v. Lewis, 837 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Ariz. 1993). · cites it 8× “Because A.R.S. § 41-1604 and administrative regulation R5-1-206 place discretion for transfer of inmates with the Director, they do not create a liberty interest for inmates to remain in general population.”

State v. Collins, 596 P.2d 385 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 4× “§ 8-241(A)(2), an award of a delinquent child to the Department of Corrections is absolute and only under the limited circumstances provided in A.R.S. § 41-1604(B)(2)(f) may the court reinvest itself with the authority over custody and control of a delinquent child.”

Dupnik v. MacDougall, 664 P.2d 189 (Ariz. 1983). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 41-1604. We believe that the Director is invested with the authority to designate the place for delivery of prisoners for assumption of custody by the Department.”

Hamm v. Ryan, 318 P.3d 868 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 12× “The classification is legitimate because it encompasses all of the relevant class and therefore the Hamms have failed to demonstrate that A.R.S. § 41-1604 is an unconstitutional special law.”

Salstrom v. State, 714 P.2d 875 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 41-1604; A.A.R.R. R5-1-201. See also Hewitt v.”

Lawrence v. Arizona Dep't of Corr., 729 P.2d 953 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “In his reply brief, appellant argues that appellees overlook the concomitant argument that, since he had been placed in administrative segregation without due process, he had been prevented from earning the credits.”

State v. Stocks, 258 P.3d 208 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “2d 189, 194 (1983) (sentencing statute vests superior court with authority to commit a prisoner to the Department of Corrections, but DOC, not the court, is vested with statutory authority under A.R.S. § 41-1604 to designate the facility where the prisoner is to be taken into…”

DeBussi v. State, 453 So. 2d 1030 (Miss. 1984). “In the cover letter, the Arizona Correctional Records Administrator stated that they were provided in accordance with ARS § 41-1604 B 2 (e) (Supp. 1983). This section concerns administrative authority to transfer prisoners between penal institutions.”

State v. Lee, 774 P.2d 228 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Statutory calculation of the credits is now set forth in A.R.S. §§ 41-1604, -1604.07, which direct the Department of Corrections to create two classes of parole eligible prisoners.”

Show all 31 citing cases →

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(A) — 1 case

Zavala v. Arizona State Pers. Bd., 766 P.2d 608 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “A.R.S. § 41-1604 was amended by Laws 1986, Ch.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(A)(2) — 6 cases

State v. Bryant, 200 P.3d 1011 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). “See AR.S. § 41-1604(A)(2) (duties of department include having custody of adult offenders).”

Litchfield Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 79 v. Babbitt, 608 P.2d 792 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). “(emphasis added) Appellees also cite A.R.S. § 41-1604(A)(2), which reads as follows: A.”

Maricopa Cnty. v. State, 616 P.2d 37 (Ariz. 1980).

Pruitt v. State (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(A)(7) — 1 case

Valenzuela v. Rogers (D. Ariz. 2020).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(A)(8) — 1 case

Koch v. Lewis, 96 F. Supp. 2d 949 (D. Ariz. 2000).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(B) — 1 case

Osborn 130581 v. Shinn (D. Ariz. 2021).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(B)(2)(d) — 1 case

Brummer 160622 v. Ryan (D. Ariz. 2020).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(B)(2)(e) — 2 cases

Casey v. Lewis, 837 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Ariz. 1993). “Because A.R.S. § 41-1604 and administrative regulation R5-1-206 place discretion for transfer of inmates with the Director, they do not create a liberty interest for inmates to remain in general population.”

Lawrence v. Arizona Dep't of Corr., 729 P.2d 953 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). “In his reply brief, appellant argues that appellees overlook the concomitant argument that, since he had been placed in administrative segregation without due process, he had been prevented from earning the credits.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(B)(2)(f) — 1 case

State v. Collins, 596 P.2d 385 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). “§ 8-241(A)(2), an award of a delinquent child to the Department of Corrections is absolute and only under the limited circumstances provided in A.R.S. § 41-1604(B)(2)(f) may the court reinvest itself with the authority over custody and control of a delinquent child.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(B)(3) — 2 cases

Hamm v. Ryan, 318 P.3d 868 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). “The classification is legitimate because it encompasses all of the relevant class and therefore the Hamms have failed to demonstrate that A.R.S. § 41-1604 is an unconstitutional special law.”

Arner v. Ryan (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 41-1604(a)(2) — 1 case

Litchfield Elementary Sch. Dist. No. 79 v. Babbitt, 608 P.2d 792 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). “(emphasis added) Appellees also cite A.R.S. § 41-1604(A)(2), which reads as follows: A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.