Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1262 (2026)

New motor vehicle; repair during express warranty or two years or twenty-four thousand miles

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties:

1. A consumer shall report the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer or issuer of a warranty during the shorter of the following:

(a) The term of the express warranty.

(b) The period of two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier.

2. The manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer or the issuer of a warranty shall make those repairs that are necessary to conform the motor vehicle to such express warranties, even if the repairs are made after the expiration of the term or two year period or twenty-four thousand mile limit.

B. This section does not limit in any way the remedies available to a consumer under a new motor vehicle warranty that extends beyond the limits prescribed in this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2009 · leading case: Hull v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 99 P.3d 1026 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).
Hull v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 99 P.3d 1026 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “If a consumer of a motor vehicle reports to the manufacturer a defect or nonconformity covered by the manufacturer’s express warranty, the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers must make the repairs necessary to correct the problem. § 44-1262(A)(2).”
Kennedy v. Linda Brock Auto. Plaza, Inc., 856 P.2d 1201 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer shall make those repairs that are necessary to conform the motor vehicle to such express warran-ties____ A.R.S. § 44-1262. The next section provides remedies if the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer fails to comply…”
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors, 219 P.3d 237 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 44-1262; Kennedy, 175 Ariz. at 324, 326 , 856 P.”
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 108 P.3d 922 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. §§ 44-1262(A) (2003), 44-1263(A) (Supp.”
Hull v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “A.R.S. § 44-1262. If a consumer of a motor vehicle reports to the manufacturer a defect or nonconformity covered by the manufacturer’s express warranty, the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers must make the repairs necessary to correct the problem.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1262(A) — 1 case
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 108 P.3d 922 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “A.R.S. §§ 44-1262(A) (2003), 44-1263(A) (Supp.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1262(A)(2) — 2 cases
Hull v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 99 P.3d 1026 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). “If a consumer of a motor vehicle reports to the manufacturer a defect or nonconformity covered by the manufacturer’s express warranty, the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers must make the repairs necessary to correct the problem. § 44-1262(A)(2).”
Hull v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004). “A.R.S. § 44-1262. If a consumer of a motor vehicle reports to the manufacturer a defect or nonconformity covered by the manufacturer’s express warranty, the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers must make the repairs necessary to correct the problem.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.