Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 47
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9504 (2026)

Indication of collateral

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A financing statement sufficiently indicates the collateral that it covers if the financing statement provides:

1. A description of the collateral pursuant to section 47-9108; or

2. An indication that the financing statement covers all assets or all personal property.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2014 · leading case: Int'l Harvester Co. v. Fuoss, 758 P.2d 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Int'l Harvester Co. v. Fuoss, 758 P.2d 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 8× “The guarantors argue that 1) they were discharged from any obligation on the open account because IH’s action against the corporation primarily liable was barred by the statute of limitations; 2) that they were entitled to notice of resale of repossessed equipment and parts…”
Poling v. Morgan, 829 F.2d 882 (9th Cir. 1987). · cites it 3× “See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 47-9504(A), 47-2706(D)(3), 47-9507.”
Poling v. Morgan, 598 F. Supp. 686 (D. Ariz. 1984). · cites it 2× “It would also result in a waiver of other non-waivable procedures and rights dictated by § 47-9501(C).”
C. Bud Racicky Agency, Inc. v. Wood Gundy, Inc., 767 P.2d 601 (Wyo. 1989). “§ 34-21-963 (1977) (as amended 1983) and Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 47-9504 (1988). 8 Therefore, we will apply Wyoming law to this case, particularly Wyoming’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
State v. Andrus, No. 1 CA-CR 13-0367 (Ariz. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2014). · cites it 2× “§ 47- 9502(A) (requirements of a financing statement); A.R.S. § 47-9504 (identification of collateral).”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9504(A): 1 case
Poling v. Morgan, 829 F.2d 882 (9th Cir. 1987). “See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 47-9504(A), 47-2706(D)(3), 47-9507.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9504(C): 1 case
Int'l Harvester Co. v. Fuoss, 758 P.2d 649 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “The guarantors argue that 1) they were discharged from any obligation on the open account because IH’s action against the corporation primarily liable was barred by the statute of limitations; 2) that they were entitled to notice of resale of repossessed equipment and parts…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9504(D): 1 case
Poling v. Morgan, 829 F.2d 882 (9th Cir. 1987). “See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 47-9504(A), 47-2706(D)(3), 47-9507.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9504(E): 1 case
Poling v. Morgan, 829 F.2d 882 (9th Cir. 1987). “See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 47-9504(A), 47-2706(D)(3), 47-9507.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.