Ark. Code Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 02
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 10-2-201 (2020)

Payment of salaries

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
    1. The annual salaries of members of the Senate and the House of Representatives established by law shall be payable in equal monthly installments from funds appropriated for that purpose.
    2. The Auditor of State is designated as disbursing officer of funds appropriated for payment of salaries of members of the General Assembly.
    3. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any per diem, mileage, or other allowances payable to members of the General Assembly, and the per diem, mileage, or other allowances shall be payable in the manner prescribed by law.
  2. The salaries which are due the members and officers of the General Assembly shall be certified by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, respectively, to the Auditor of State, who shall issue his or her warrant therefor on the Treasurer of State, which shall be paid out of any moneys in the State Treasury not otherwise appropriated.

History. Acts 1836, § 4, p. 46; C. & M. Dig., § 4958; Pope's Dig., § 6188; Acts 1959, No. 6, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 4-157.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: James Parsons v. Preferred Fam. Healthcare, Inc., 2022 Ark. App. 277, 647 S.W.3d 120.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
James Parsons v. Preferred Fam. Healthcare, Inc., 2022 Ark. App. 277, 647 S.W.3d 120. · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 10-2-201 (Repl. 2012). The constitutional provision at issue is straightforward: “Any citizen of any county, city or town may institute suit on behalf of himself and all others interested, to protect the inhabitants thereof against the enforcement of any…”
James Parsons v. Preferred Fam. Healthcare, Inc., 2022 Ark. App. 277, 647 S.W.3d 120. · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 10-2-201 (Repl. 2012). The constitutional provision at issue is straightforward: “Any citizen of any county, city or town may institute suit on behalf of himself and all others interested, to protect the inhabitants thereof against the enforcement of any…”
James Parsons v. Preferred Fam. Healthcare, Inc., 2022 Ark. App. 277, 647 S.W.3d 120. · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 10-2-201 (Repl. 2012). The constitutional provision at issue is straightforward: “Any citizen of any county, city or town may institute suit on behalf of himself and all others interested, to protect the inhabitants thereof against the enforcement of any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.