Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 14-14-101 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter constitutes the Arkansas “County Government Code”.

History. Acts 1977, No. 742, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 17-3101.

Case Notes

Cited: Ark. County v. Burris, 308 Ark. 490, 825 S.W.2d 590 (1992).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1992–2020 · leading case: Parker v. Crow, 368 S.W.3d 902 (Ark. 2010).
Parker v. Crow, 368 S.W.3d 902 (Ark. 2010). · cites it 2× “Arkansas Code Annotated sections 14-14-101 to—1314 (Supp. 2009), which was enacted pursuant to amendment 55, sets out the County Government Code and defines state law regarding the organization and powers granted to county governments and officials.”
Blevins v. Hudson, 489 S.W.3d 165 (Ark. 2016). “Blevins filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the grievance proceedings amounted to an ultra vires assertion of power by Hudson, as an administrative county judge, over Blevins, an elected official of a judicial district in violation of Arkansas Code Annotated §…”
Arkansas Cnty. v. Burris, 825 S.W.2d 590 (Ark. 1992). · cites it 2× “§§ 14-233-101 to -121 (1987), and Act 742 of 1977, as amended, known as the Arkansas County Government Code and codified in Ark. Code Ann. §§ 14-14-101 to -1313 (1987).”
Bd. of Trs. of the Ark. Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys. v. Garrison, 576 S.W.3d 485 (Ark. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “Specifically, there is uniform agreement that all three county administrative boards (Craighead, Union, and Lawrence) hire the staff, fire the staff, decide bonuses for the staff, deal with posttermination issues regarding the staff, sign off on the paperwork needed to maintain…”
Pulaski Cnty. v. Jacuzzi Bros. Div., 875 S.W.2d 496 (Ark. 1994). “742 (§§ 14-14-101 et seq), enacted after the passage in 1977 of Amendment 55 to the Arkansas Constitution.”
Gravett v. Villines, 862 S.W.2d 260 (1993). “[Codified as Ark. Code Ann. §§ 14-14-101 — 14-14-1313 (1987 and Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.