Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304 (2026)

Integration orders generally

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. All orders requiring integration shall be made after notice and an opportunity for a hearing and shall be upon terms and conditions that are just and reasonable and that will afford the owner of each tract or interest in the drilling unit the opportunity to recover or receive his or her just and equitable share of the oil and gas in the pool without unnecessary expense and will prevent or minimize reasonably avoidable drainage from each developed unit which is not equalized by counter drainage.
  2. In the event the drilling of a well has not been commenced or, if commenced, the well has not been completed as a well capable of producing oil and gas in commercial quantities on the lands comprising the drilling unit on the effective date of the order requiring integration, the order shall:
    1. Authorize the drilling or completion and the equipping and operation of a well on the drilling unit;
    2. Provide who shall drill, complete, and operate the well;
    3. Prescribe the time and manner in which all owners in the drilling unit who may desire to pay their share of the costs of such operations and participate therein may elect to do so; and
      1. Provide that an owner who does not affirmatively elect to participate in the risk and cost of the operations shall transfer his or her rights in the drilling unit and the production from the unit well to the parties who elect to participate in the risk and cost of the operations for a reasonable consideration and on a reasonable basis that shall be determined, in the absence of agreement between the parties, by the Oil and Gas Commission or by the Director of Production and Conservation, if the order is eligible for approval in accordance with rules adopted by the commission.
      2. The transfer may be either a permanent transfer or may be for a limited period pending recoupment out of the share of production attributable to the interest of the nonparticipating owner by the participating parties of an amount equal to the share of the costs that would have been borne by the nonparticipating party had he or she participated in the operations, plus an additional sum to be fixed by the commission or by the director if the order is eligible for approval in accordance with rules adopted by the commission.
  3. In the event there is a well capable of producing oil or gas in commercial quantities on the lands comprising the drilling unit on the effective date of the order requiring integration, the order shall:
    1. Authorize the operation of the well;
    2. Provide who shall operate the well; and
    3. Provide that within the time stipulated in the order any owner in the drilling unit who did not participate in the drilling of the well shall either reimburse the drilling parties in cash for his or her share of the actual cost of drilling, completing, and equipping the well or shall transfer his or her rights in such drilling unit and the production from the well to the drilling parties until those parties have received out of the share of production attributable to the interest so transferred an amount equal to the share of the costs that would have been borne by the transferring party had he or she participated in drilling, completing, equipping, and operating the well, plus an additional sum to be fixed by the commission.
  4. In the event there is an unleased mineral interest or interests in any drilling unit, the owner thereof shall be regarded as the owner of a royalty interest to the extent of a one-eighth interest in and to the unleased mineral interest. This royalty interest shall not be affected by the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of this section.

History. Acts 1939, No. 105, § 15; 1963, No. 536, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 53-115; Acts 2015, No. 906, § 2.

Amendments. The 2015 amendment inserted “after an opportunity for a” preceding “hearing” in (a); redesignated (b)(4) as (b)(4)(A) and (B); in (b)(4)(A), substituted the second occurrence of “in the risk and cost of the operations” for “therein” and added “or by the Director of the Oil and Gas Commission, if the order is eligible for approval in accordance with rules adopted by the commission”; and added “or by the director if the order is eligible for approval in accordance with rules adopted by the commission” at the end of (b)(4)(B).

Research References

Ark. L. Rev.

Thomas A. Daily, Symposium Article: Rules Done Right: How Arkansas Brought Its Oil and Gas Law into a Horizontal World, 68 Ark. L. Rev. 259 (2015).

Case Notes

Constitutionality.

Circuit court did not err in affirming an order of the Oil and Gas Commission integrating an owner's unleased mineral interests into a drilling unit because the owner failed to satisfy his burden of showing that § 15-72-303 and this section clearly violated Ark. Const., Art. 2, § 22; the Commission's integration of the owner's mineral interest was not a compensable taking but a constitutional exercise of the State's police power. Gawenis v. Ark. Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238, 464 S.W.3d 453 (2015).

Circuit court did not err in affirming an order of the Oil and Gas Commission integrating an owner's unleased mineral interests into a drilling unit; the owner cited no authority for the proposition that the forced-integration provisions constituted a corporate “appropriation” of his property under Ark. Const., Art. 12, § 9, and thus, he had no constitutional right to a jury trial on the issue of compensation. Gawenis v. Ark. Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238, 464 S.W.3d 453 (2015).

Reasonable Compensation.

This section does not require the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission to award the highest bonus historically paid when unleased mineral owners are directed to transfer their rights in a drilling unit and the product from the unit well to the parties who elect to participate therein; it requires only reasonable consideration and a reasonable basis. Walls v. Ark. Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2012 Ark. 418 (2012).

Decision of the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission that the owners' compensation be at a rate of $ 500 per net mineral acre and a one-eighth royalty was supported by substantial evidence as: (1) this section did not require the Commission to award the highest bonus historically paid; (2) this section required only reasonable consideration and a reasonable basis; and (3) there was evidence that the corporation had about 265 acres under lease and that the best terms paid were $ 800 and a one-sixth royalty, $ 500 and a one-eighth royalty, and $ 225 and a three-sixteenths royalty. Walls v. Ark. Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2012 Ark. 418 (2012).

Cited: Fife v. Thompson, 288 Ark. 620, 708 S.W.2d 611 (1986).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2023 · leading case: Gawenis v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238 (Ark. 2015).
Gawenis v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238 (Ark. 2015). · cites it 6× “” Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304 (a). When, as in this case, there is no well drilled in the unit, the integration order (1) authorizes the drilling, equipping, and operation of a well on the drilling unit, (2) provides who shall 3 “Owner,” as used in the Act, “means the person who…”
Walls v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 390 S.W.3d 88 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “” Ark.Code Ann. § 15-72-304(b)(4) (Repl. 2009).”
Hurd v. Flywheel Energy Prod. LLC (E.D. Ark. 2023). · cites it 7× “25 24 See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 15-72-304 (d), 305(a)(3).”
Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304(a): 3 cases
Gawenis v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238 (Ark. 2015). “” Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304 (a). When, as in this case, there is no well drilled in the unit, the integration order (1) authorizes the drilling, equipping, and operation of a well on the drilling unit, (2) provides who shall 3 “Owner,” as used in the Act, “means the person who…”
Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304(b)(1): 1 case
Gawenis v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238 (Ark. 2015). “” Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304 (a). When, as in this case, there is no well drilled in the unit, the integration order (1) authorizes the drilling, equipping, and operation of a well on the drilling unit, (2) provides who shall 3 “Owner,” as used in the Act, “means the person who…”
Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304(b)(2): 1 case
Hurd v. Flywheel Energy Prod. LLC (E.D. Ark. 2023). “25 24 See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 15-72-304 (d), 305(a)(3).”
Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304(b)(4): 1 case
Walls v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 390 S.W.3d 88 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012). “” Ark.Code Ann. § 15-72-304(b)(4) (Repl. 2009).”
Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304(b)(l): 1 case
Gawenis v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, 2015 Ark. 238 (Ark. 2015). “” Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304 (a). When, as in this case, there is no well drilled in the unit, the integration order (1) authorizes the drilling, equipping, and operation of a well on the drilling unit, (2) provides who shall 3 “Owner,” as used in the Act, “means the person who…”
Ark. Code Ann. § 15-72-304(d): 1 case
Hurd v. Flywheel Energy Prod. LLC (E.D. Ark. 2023). “25 24 See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 15-72-304 (d), 305(a)(3).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.