Publisher's Notes.
This section, and its exceptions, concerning the rule that only one offense is chargeable in an indictment, was repealed by Acts 2005, No. 1994, § 503. The section was derived from Crim. Code, §§ 125, 126; Acts 1901, No. 11, § 1, p. 22; C. & M. Dig., §§ 3015, 3016; Acts 1921, No. 230, § 1; Init. Meas. 1936, No. 3, § 20, Acts 1937, p. 1384; Pope's Dig., §§ 3837, 3838; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 43-1009, 43-1010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1989–1995 · leading case:
Logan v. State, 773 S.W.2d 413 (Ark. 1989).
Logan v. State, 773 S.W.2d 413 (Ark. 1989).
· cites it 6× “If they were different crimes they could not be charged together, Ark.Code Ann. § 16-85-404 (1987), but they are not crimes of different natures.”
Richmond v. State, 791 S.W.2d 691 (Ark. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-85-404 (a) (1987). However, the information may allege the modes and means of the offense in the alternative.”
Rucker v. State, 899 S.W.2d 447 (Ark. 1995).
“The information was amended to add as an alternative, the charge of premeditated and deliberated murder, pursuant to § 5-10-101.”
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-85-404(a): 2 cases
Logan v. State, 773 S.W.2d 413 (Ark. 1989).
“If they were different crimes they could not be charged together, Ark.Code Ann. § 16-85-404 (1987), but they are not crimes of different natures.”
Rucker v. State, 899 S.W.2d 447 (Ark. 1995).
“The information was amended to add as an alternative, the charge of premeditated and deliberated murder, pursuant to § 5-10-101.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.