Ark. Code Ann. » Title 17 Chapter 39
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 17-39-107 (2020)

Disposition of funds

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. All fees collected under this subchapter and subchapter 2 shall be deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the Department of Arkansas State Police Fund.
    1. All funds received by the Department of Arkansas State Police shall be deposited into the State Treasury as special revenues to the credit of the Department of Arkansas State Police Fund.
    2. Money remaining at the end of the fiscal year shall not revert to any other fund but shall carry over to the next fiscal year.

History. Acts 1967, No. 413, § 5; A.S.A. 1947, § 71-2205; Acts 2013, No. 1216, § 7; 2015, No. 393, § 8.

Amendments. The 2013 amendment substituted “deposited into the State Treasury to the credit of the Department of Arkansas State Police Fund” for “paid to the Treasurer of State” at the end of (a); and rewrote (b).

The 2015 amendment deleted “the provisions of” preceding “this chapter” in (a); and, in (b)(1), substituted “Department of Arkansas State Police” for “Arkansas Board of Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies” and substituted “Department of Arkansas State Police Fund” for “fund”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1990 · leading case: Cozad v. State, 792 S.W.2d 606 (Ark. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cozad v. State, 792 S.W.2d 606 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 16× “In his appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his asserted privilege under Ark.Code Ann. § 17-39-107 (1987) involving a conversation he had with a certified licensed social worker.”
State v. Sypult, 800 S.W.2d 402 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 6× “Recently, we considered § 12-12-511(a) and whether it was controlling in a situation where the social worker privilege law, Ark.Code Ann. § 17-39-107 (1987), had been invoked by a defendant charged with a sex abuse crime.”
Ark. Code Ann. § 17-39-107(2): 1 case
Cozad v. State, 792 S.W.2d 606 (Ark. 1990). “In his appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his asserted privilege under Ark.Code Ann. § 17-39-107 (1987) involving a conversation he had with a certified licensed social worker.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.