Arkansas Code Annotated
Ark. Code Ann. § 23-111-101 (2026)
Title
✓ current as of May 2026
This chapter shall be referred to and may be cited as the “Arkansas Greyhound Racing Law”.
History. Acts 1957, No. 191, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 84-2816.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2007 · leading case: Christian Civic Action Comm. v. McCuen, 884 S.W.2d 605 (Ark. 1994).
Christian Civic Action Comm. v. McCuen, 884 S.W.2d 605 (Ark. 1994). “See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 23-111-101 — 515 (1987 & Supp.”
Gallas v. Alexander, 263 S.W.3d 494 (Ark. 2007). “, or the Arkansas Greyhound Racing Law, § 23-111-101 et seq., whether pari-mutuel wagering on live racing, simulcast racing, or races conducted in the past and rebroadcast by electronic means[.”
Parker v. Priest, 930 S.W.2d 322 (Ark. 1996). “Ark. Code Ann. §§ 23-111-101 to -515 (Repl.”
Meeks v. Greenville Casino Partners, L.P. (In Re Armstrong), 217 B.R. 569 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1998). “, and dog racing, under the Arkansas Greyhound Racing Law, Ark.Code Ann. § 23-111-101, et seq. The state not only allows horse and dog racing, it expressly permits regulated wagering on these activities.”
Meeks v. Red River Ent. of Shreveport (In Re Armstrong), 231 B.R. 739 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1999). “Indeed, the legislature, in permitting gambling in Arkansas, has stated that horse racing “and activities related thereto in Arkansas have had a most significant favorable impact on the economy of the entire state and the welfare of our citizens and residents-” 1987 Ark.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.