Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 23-42-504 (2020)

Exempted transactions

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. The following transactions are exempted from §§ 23-42-501 and 23-42-502:
    1. Any isolated nonissuer transactions, whether effected through a broker-dealer or not, provided that repeated or successive transactions shall be prima facie evidence that the transactions are not isolated nonissuer transactions;
    2. Any nonissuer transaction by a registered agent of a registered broker-dealer, and any resale transaction by a sponsor of a unit investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, in a security of a class that has been outstanding in the hands of the public for at least ninety (90) days, provided at the time of the transaction:
      1. The issuer of the security is actually engaged in business and not in the organization stage or in bankruptcy or receivership and is not a blank check, blind pool, or shell company whose primary plan of business is to engage in a merger or combination of the business with, or an acquisition of, an unidentified person or persons;
      2. The security is sold at a price reasonably related to the current market price of the security;
      3. The security does not constitute the whole or part of an unsold allotment to, or a subscription or participation by, the broker-dealer as an underwriter of the security;
      4. A nationally recognized securities manual designated by rule or order of the Securities Commissioner or a document filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is publicly available through the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system and contains:
        1. A description of the business and operations of the issuer;
        2. The names of the issuer's officers and directors, if any, or, in the case of an issuer not domiciled in the United States, the corporate equivalents of such persons in the issuer's country of domicile;
        3. An audited balance sheet of the issuer as of a date within eighteen (18) months or, in the case of a reorganization or merger when the parties to the reorganization or merger had such audited balance sheets, a pro forma balance sheet; and
        4. An audited income statement for each of the issuer's immediately preceding two (2) fiscal years, or for the period of existence of the issuer, if in existence for less than two (2) years, or, in the case of a reorganization or merger when the parties to the reorganization or merger had such audited income statements, a pro forma income statement; and
      5. The issuer of the security has a class of equity securities listed on a national securities exchange registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011, unless:
        1. The issuer of the security is a unit investment trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2011;
        2. The issuer and predecessors of the issuer of the security have been engaged in continuous business for at least three (3) years; or
        3. The issuer of the security has total assets of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000) based on:
          1. An audited balance sheet dated within the past eighteen (18) months; or
          2. In the case of a reorganization or merger of parties with audited balance sheets dated within the past eighteen (18) months showing total assets of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000), a pro forma balance sheet;
    3. Any transaction between the issuer or other person on whose behalf the offering is made and an underwriter, or among underwriters;
    4. Any transaction in a bond or other evidence of indebtedness secured by a real or chattel mortgage or deed of trust, or by an agreement for the sale of real estate or chattels if the entire mortgage, deed of trust, or agreement, together with all the bonds or other evidences of indebtedness secured thereby, is offered and sold as a unit;
    5. Any transactions by an executor, administrator, sheriff, marshal, receiver, trustee in bankruptcy, guardian, or conservator;
    6. Any transaction executed by a bona fide pledgee without any purpose of evading this chapter;
    7. A transaction by a person exempted from registration under § 23-42-102(3)(B)(v) if the transaction would be lawful in the place of residence of the offeree or purchaser had it occurred there instead of in this state;
      1. Any offer or sale to a bank, savings institution, trust company, insurance company, investment company as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, pension or profit-sharing trust, or other financial institution or institutional buyer, or to a broker-dealer, whether the purchaser is acting for itself or in some fiduciary capacity.
      2. The commissioner may by order, upon petition by any person, determine if the petitioner may be deemed, upon the basis of knowledge, experience, volume, and number of transactions, and other securities background, an “institutional buyer” for purposes of subdivision (a)(8)(A) of this section;
      1. Any transaction pursuant to an offer and sale to not more than thirty-five (35) purchasers other than those designated in subdivision (a)(8) of this section during any period of twelve (12) consecutive months, if:
        1. The seller reasonably believes that all the buyers are purchasing for investment; and
        2. A commission or other remuneration shall not be paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting any prospective buyer in this state unless the person receiving any such commission or remuneration is registered under § 23-42-301.
      2. However, the commissioner may by rule or order, as to any security or transaction or any type of security or transaction, withdraw or further condition this exemption, or increase or decrease the number of purchasers permitted, or waive the conditions in subdivisions (a)(9)(A)(i) and (ii) of this section with or without the substitution of a limitation on remuneration;
    8. Any transaction pursuant to an offer to existing security holders of the issuer, including persons who at the time of the transaction are holders of convertible securities or warrants, if no commission or other remuneration, other than a standby commission, is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting any security holder in this state, unless the commissioner shall, upon written application, permit the payment of a commission or other remuneration with or without the substitution of a limitation on remuneration;
    9. Any offer, but not a sale, of a security for which registration statements have been filed under both this chapter and the Securities Act of 1933 if no order or refusal order is in effect and no public proceeding or examination looking toward such an order is pending under either act;
    10. An offer or sale of a security by an issuer if:
      1. Either of the following applies:
        1. The issuer of the security is a corporation or other business entity organized and operating under the laws of this state and has its principal place of business in Arkansas and the transaction meets the requirements of the federal exemption for intrastate offerings in section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77c(a)(11), as it existed on January 1, 2017, and Rule 147 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 230.147, as it existed on January 1, 2017, and as such, the securities shall be offered to and sold only to persons who are residents of this state at the time of purchase; or
        2. The issuer of the security is a corporation or other business entity with its principal place of business in Arkansas and the transaction meets the requirements of the federal exemption for intrastate offerings in section 28 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77z-3, as it existed on January 1, 2017, and Rule 147A of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 C.F.R. § 230.147A, as it existed on January 1, 2017, and as such, the securities shall be sold only to persons who are residents of this state at the time of purchase;
      2. The sum of all cash and other consideration to be received for all sales of the security in reliance upon the exemption described in this subdivision (a)(12) shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000), less the aggregate amount received for all sales of securities by the issuer within six (6) months after the completion of the offering;
      3. The issuer shall not accept more than five thousand dollars ($5,000) from any single purchaser unless the purchaser is an accredited investor as defined by Rule 501 of United States Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation D, 17 C.F.R. § 230.501, as it existed on January 1, 2017;
      4. The issuer should reasonably believe that all purchasers of securities are purchasing for investment and not for sale in connection with a distribution of the security;
      5. A commission or remuneration shall not be paid or given, directly or indirectly, for a person's participation in the offer or sale of securities for the issuer unless the person is registered as a broker-dealer or agent under this chapter;
      6. The commissioner may by rule or order, as to any security or transaction or any type of security or transaction, withdraw or further condition the exemption under this subdivision (a)(12); and
      7. A filing fee of one hundred dollars ($100) shall be paid to the commissioner for every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under this subdivision (a)(12);
    11. Any other transaction that the commissioner by rule or order exempts as not being necessary or appropriate in the public interest for the protection of investors; and
    12. An offer or sale of a security to a person who is not a resident of this state and is not present in this state, if the offer or sale is not:
      1. A violation of the laws of the state or foreign jurisdiction in which the offeree or purchaser is present; and
      2. Part of an unlawful plan or scheme to evade this chapter.
    1. Before any transaction shall be executed as an exempted transaction under subdivision (a)(9) or subdivision (a)(10) of this section, except, in the case of dividend reinvestment and stock purchase programs pursuant to subdivision (a)(10) of this section, a proof of exemption must first be filed with the commissioner and the commissioner by order shall not have disallowed the exemption within the next ten (10) full business days. Before any dividend reinvestment and stock purchase program shall be executed as an exempt transaction under subdivision (a)(10) of this section, an initial proof of exemption shall be filed. Thereafter, in every fifth year a proof of exemption must be filed with the commissioner, and the commissioner by order must not have disallowed the exemption within the next ten (10) full business days.
    2. The proof of exemption shall contain a statement of the grounds upon which the exemption is claimed and a designation of the subsection of this section under which the exemption is claimed.
    3. Proofs of exemption which have not been completed within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after filing with the commissioner may be deemed abandoned and considered withdrawn by the applicant, provided the applicant has been notified of the deficiencies to the proof and afforded a reasonable opportunity to correct such deficiencies.
      1. For every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under subdivision (a)(9) of this section, there shall be paid to the commissioner a filing fee of one-tenth percent (0.1%) of the maximum aggregate offering price at which the securities are to be offered in this state, but the fee shall in no case be less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) or more than five hundred dollars ($500).
      2. For every proof of exemption filed with the commissioner under subdivision (a)(10) of this section, there shall be paid to the commissioner a filing fee of fifty dollars ($50.00).
      3. The commissioner shall have authority under this subsection to amend or rescind the filing fees by rule or order if the commissioner determines that the fee is excessive under the circumstances.

History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 14; 1961, No. 248, § 7; 1963, No. 512, § 1; 1971, No. 131, § 4; 1973, No. 47, §§ 13, 15; 1975, No. 844, §§ 9, 10, 12; 1977, No. 493, § 8; 1983, No. 836, §§ 20, 25; 1985, No. 610, § 1; 1985, No. 939, § 8; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1248; Acts 1995, No. 845, § 27; 1997, No. 173, § 21; 1999, No. 363, § 3; 2005, No. 420, § 3; 2009, No. 462, § 12; 2011, No. 339, § 14; 2013, No. 460, § 13; 2017, No. 668, § 23; 2019, No. 110, §§ 3, 4.

A.C.R.C. Notes. Rule 147A of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission became effective April 20, 2017. The 2016 amendments to Rule 147 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission became effective April 20, 2017.

Amendments. The 2009 amendment, in (a)(2)(E), inserted “15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2009” and deleted “or designated for trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System” preceding “unless,” inserted “15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq., as it existed on January 1, 2009” in (a)(2)(E)(i), subdivided (a)(2)(E)(iii), inserted “dated within the past eighteen (18) months showing total assets of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000)” in (a)(2)(E)(iii)(b), and made related and minor stylistic changes.

The 2011 amendment substituted “January 1, 2011” for “January 1, 2009” in (a)(2)(E) and (a)(2)(E)(i).

The 2013 amendment, in (a)(7), substituted “A transaction” for “Any transaction” and “if the transaction” for “provided that the transaction.”

The 2017 amendment, in the introductory language of (a)(2)(D), substituted “Securities Commissioner” for “commissioner” and twice inserted “United States”; substituted “commissioner” for “Securities Commissioner” in (a)(8)(B); inserted present (a)(12); redesignated former (a)(12) as (a)(13); and made stylistic changes.

The 2019 amendment deleted former (a)(8)(A); redesignated the former introductory language of (a)(8) and the former first sentence of (a)(8)(B) as (a)(8)(A); substituted “subdivision (a)(8)(A) of this section” for “this subdivision (a)(8)” in (a)(8)(B); and added (a)(14).

U.S. Code. The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in this section, is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq. The Securities Act of 1933 is codified as 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq. Sections 12, 13, and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are codified as 15 U.S.C. §§ 78 l , 78m, and 78o(d), respectively.

Research References

Ark. L. Notes.

Carol Goforth, Crowdfunding in Arkansas? Yes, you can!, 71 Ark. L. Notes 1 (2019).

U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev.

Annual Survey of Caselaw, Business Law, 25 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 885.

Survey of Legislation, 2005 Arkansas General Assembly, Insurance Law, 28 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 393.

John F. Griffee, IV, Guide to Structuring Resales of Restricted Securities Held by Control and Non-Control Holders Under Federal and Arkansas Law, 38 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 1 (2015).

Case Notes

Constitutionality.

Fact that reasonable exemptions were made did not make former act unconstitutional; and fact that former act which provided for the regulation and supervision of investment companies made exceptions in favor of notes secured by mortgages on real estate in state of Arkansas did not render the act void. Standard Home Co. v. Davis, 217 F. 904 (E.D. Ark. 1914) (decision under prior law).

Institutional Buyer.

Where individual himself, and not a bank, directed the investment of an IRA, and there was no indication that he was aided in any manner by a bank or its officials, that individual was not an “institutional buyer” within the meaning of subdivision (a)(8). F & M Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners Ltd. Partnership, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988).

Isolated Nonissuer Transactions.

Certain stock transactions were “isolated nonissuer” as a result of the insider status of two of the purchases, and the small infrequent number of sales. Rucker v. La-Co, Inc., 496 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1974).

The purpose of the exemption of subdivision (a)(1) of this section is to exempt from registration small, isolated transactions between private individuals. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).

Where transactions were “transactions pursuant to an offer” as contemplated by former § 23-42-102(10)(B) (see now subdivision (a)(9) of this section) and corporation did not file proof of exemption as required, transactions of corporation were not exempt from registration as isolated nonissuer transaction under subdivision (a)(1) of this section. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).

Joint Ventures.

Where sellers of joint venture interests in an apartment complex received consulting fees, and organized, constructed, managed and controlled the properties of the joint venture, the joint venture interests were not exempt from registration. Schultz v. Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc., 261 Ark. 769, 552 S.W.2d 4 (1977).

Proof of Exemption.

Contention of prosecution that exemption offered under this section is postponed unless and until the reasons set forth in the application as the basis for the exemption are true and are in good faith carried out was erroneous, since such interpretation would require, in effect, that the accused prove his innocence to avoid conviction, rather than the state being required to prove him guilty before obtaining a conviction. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).

Nowhere in subdivision (a)(9) and subsection (b) of this section is there language that could be reasonably construed to give the Commissioner the power to waive the requirement that a proof of exemption must be filed; and rule promulgated by Securities Commissioner exempting certain transactions from the registration and proof of exemption requirement of subsection (b) of this section was not a valid exercise of the rulemaking authority granted to the commissioner under § 23-42-503. Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).

Transactions Pursuant to Offers.

Stocks were held exempt under this section where less than 25 persons were offered the stock, the corporation believed the purchases were for investment, and the Arkansas Securities Commissioner had exempted the stock from registration. Rucker v. La-Co, Inc., 496 F.2d 850 (8th Cir. 1974).

Because an option to purchase a security is an interest in the security, corporation, by agreeing to grant individual an option to purchase stock, made him an offer and, for the purposes of subdivision (a)(9) of this section, all subsequent payments to escrow account and other subsequent transactions between the parties and involving the exercise of the option were “transactions pursuant to an offer” as contemplated by former § 23-42-102(10)(B) (see now subdivision (a)(9) of this section). Cole v. PPG Indus., Inc., 680 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1982).

Unlawful Sales.

Conviction of one charged with violation of § 23-42-501 and who defended on the ground that he had obtained an exemption for the security sold under subsection (a)(9) of this section was not sustained by evidence that the defendant had sold the security to persons who were not on the list of offerees filed with the Securities Commissioner in compliance with a rule of the commissioner. Gaskin v. State, 244 Ark. 541, 426 S.W.2d 407 (1968).

In a prosecution for knowingly selling unregistered securities, a verdict of guilty on counts of knowingly causing unregistered stocks to be sold was supported by evidence that sales were made before the application for exemption under this section, notwithstanding exemption was thereafter obtained. Gaskin v. State, 248 Ark. 168, 450 S.W.2d 557 (1970).

Cited: Shepherd v. State, 246 Ark. 744, 439 S.W.2d 627 (1969); Long v. Mabry, 250 Ark. 947, 470 S.W.2d 319 (1971); J & C Inv. v. Mid-South Drilling, Inc., 286 Ark. 320, 691 S.W.2d 853 (1985); Hunter v. State, 330 Ark. 198, 952 S.W.2d 145 (1997); Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2006 · leading case: Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners of Jacksonville Ltd. P'ship, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988).
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners of Jacksonville Ltd. P'ship, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988). · cites it 10× “” In response, plaintiff contends “in order for the exemptions in Ark.Code Ann. § 23-42-504 to make sense, ‘transaction’ should not be defined as a single sale of securities to a single purchaser, but rather ‘transaction’ should be defined in terms of the offering of the…”
Hunter v. State, 952 S.W.2d 145 (Ark. 1997). · cites it 2× “However, Ark. Code Ann. § 23-42-506 (Repl. 1994) provides: “In any proceding under this chapter, the burden of proving an exemption or exception from an exemption is upon the person claiming it.”
Hamby v. Clearwater Consulting Concepts, LLLP, 428 F. Supp. 2d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2006). “Defendants contend that the security was a “covered security.” The Arkansas Securities Act defines “covered security” as “any security described as a covered security in section 18(b) of the Securities Act of 1933[.”
John Peacock v. 21st Century Wireless Grp., Inc., 285 F.3d 1079 (8th Cir. 2002). · cites it 2× “See Ark.Code Ann. § 23-42-504. 3 In June 1997, Peacock and Harvey agreed to waive the provision in section 2.”
John Peacock v. 21st Century, No. 01-1751 (8th Cir. Apr. 12, 2002). “21st Century did not dispute that the sale of the unregistered stock violated Ark. Code Ann. § 23-42-504 . However, it argued that the remedy for the statutory violation was prescribed by Ark.”
Ark. Code Ann. § 23-42-504(a)(8): 1 case
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners of Jacksonville Ltd. P'ship, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988). “” In response, plaintiff contends “in order for the exemptions in Ark.Code Ann. § 23-42-504 to make sense, ‘transaction’ should not be defined as a single sale of securities to a single purchaser, but rather ‘transaction’ should be defined in terms of the offering of the…”
Ark. Code Ann. § 23-42-504(b)(l): 1 case
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Hamilton Hotel Partners of Jacksonville Ltd. P'ship, 702 F. Supp. 1417 (W.D. Ark. 1988). “” In response, plaintiff contends “in order for the exemptions in Ark.Code Ann. § 23-42-504 to make sense, ‘transaction’ should not be defined as a single sale of securities to a single purchaser, but rather ‘transaction’ should be defined in terms of the offering of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.