Ark. Code Ann. » Title 23 Chapter 66
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 23-66-201 (2020)

Title

✓ Arkansas Code release r76: Acts through about 2020 (2021-2025 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This subchapter may be referred to as the “Trade Practices Act”.

History. Acts 1959, No. 148, § 208; A.S.A. 1947, § 66-3001.

Case Notes

Cited: Douglass v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 323 Ark. 105, 913 S.W.2d 277 (1996).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Wacaser v. Ins. Comm'r, 900 S.W.2d 191 (Ark. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wacaser v. Ins. Comm'r, 900 S.W.2d 191 (Ark. 1995). · cites it 2× “Ark Code Ann. §§ 23-66-201 through 23-66-408 (Repl.”
Douglass v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 913 S.W.2d 277 (Ark. 1996). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 23-66-201 to 408 (Repl.”
Philadelphia Indem. Ins. v. Carco Rentals, Inc., 923 F. Supp. 1143 (W.D. Ark. 1996). · cites it 2× “§§ 23-79-109, 23-79-110, and others it concedes do not create private causes of action, Ark.Code Ann. § 23-66-201 et seq., and to various cases for the proposition that the incorporation of the terms and provisions of the rental agreement into the policy is invalid.”
Lackie Drug Store, Inc. v. OptumRx, Inc., 143 F.4th 985 (8th Cir. 2025). “§ 17-92-507 ; Count 2, a violation of the Trade Practices Act, Ark. Code Ann. § 23-66-201 ; Count 3, a violation of the Unfair Practices Act, Ark.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.