Ark. Code Ann. § 23-79-155 (2020)
Commercial general liability insurance
-
A commercial general liability insurance policy offered for sale in this state shall contain a definition of “occurrence” that includes:
- Accidents, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions; and
- Property damage or bodily injury resulting from faulty workmanship.
- This section is not intended to restrict or limit the nature or types of exclusions from coverage that an insurer may include in a commercial general liability insurance policy.
History. Acts 2011, No. 604, § 2.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2011, No. 604, § 1, provided:
“Findings and purpose.
“(a) It is found and determined by the General Assembly that:
“(1) Arkansas court decisions have caused uncertainty over whether the coverage provided to an insured under a commercial liability insurance policy will include damages caused by faulty workmanship;
“(2) Insurance consumers purchase commercial liability insurance coverage for substantial premiums in good faith for the express purpose of limiting their liability for faulty workmanship; and
“(3) An insurer should not be allowed to collect premiums to provide coverage against defects and then contest, deny, or fail to pay claims caused by faulty workmanship unless the insurer and insured have freely negotiated a specific exclusion from the coverage.
“(b) It is the purpose of this act to allow an insurance consumer to safely purchase commercial liability insurance coverage at a fair price to insure against the risk of property damage or bodily injury resulting from faulty workmanship.”
Case Notes
Retroactive Operation.
In an action arising from the subcontractors' faulty work on a home, the district court properly dismissed the general contractor's breach of contract claim against the insurer because defective work resulting in damages only to the work product itself was not an “occurrence” as defined in the commercial general liability policy under Essex. The court of appeals could not retroactively apply this section, which overruled Essex; instead, the insurance policy was governed by the law in effect at the time of its issuance. J-McDaniel Constr. Co. v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 761 F.3d 916 (8th Cir. 2014).